Matt Cutts Confirms Nofollow FIX

20.07.07

ever since Nofollow came out you could squeeze a little Juice out of it, But Yesterday Matt Cutts posted here on David Naylor that, They had fixed The Problem !

DaveN’s Statement :

“Nofollow links can play a little in search ranking, we have all seen test’s where Bloggers have signed Blogs, with an obscure anchor texts and these Blogs had nofollow’s and the target site ranks for these obscure terms now.”

Matt Cutts Statement ( well post ) :

You need to recheck that, because it’s not correct …

Don’t believe me? Check it by doing a nofollow link with obscure anchortext to an obscure page, and see for yourself.

22 Comments

  • 1

    That’s sad. I really like that one :(

    Wonderbaum
    http://www.mrieck.com

    20th July 2007 @ 09:35

  • 2

    Doh OK stopping my bots :-)

    ISCR

    20th July 2007 @ 10:46

  • 3

    So did I, I was convinced that it was helping.

    Matt
    http://www.creativesuit.co.uk

    20th July 2007 @ 10:52

  • 4

    So do you believe its fixed Dave?

    MattC
    http://www.aosep.com

    20th July 2007 @ 13:01

  • 5

    Matt has never lied to me before so I have no reason to disbelieve him this time
    Dave

    DaveN

    20th July 2007 @ 17:58

  • 6

    MattC, believe it. Cool name, btw. :)

    Matt Cutts
    http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/

    20th July 2007 @ 22:28

  • 7

    Sure, Mr. Cutts… Just like you “fixed” googlebombs, eh?

    donthavname

    21st July 2007 @ 00:45

  • 8

    Thank you for confirming this fix, however I am sad to see it. lol

    SEMSpot
    http://www.semspot.com

    21st July 2007 @ 03:57

  • 9

    yeah…
    wonder what happen if we all use nofollow?

    Have a good one.

    SEO
    http://www.seo-watch.com

    22nd July 2007 @ 09:17

  • 10

    yeah… !
    Wonder what happen if we all use nofollow on our websites? And how about DMOZ & Yahoo directory.

    Have a good one.

    SEO
    http://www.seo-watch.com

    22nd July 2007 @ 10:46

  • 11

    [...] a recent post on Dave Naylor’s blog, Matt Cutts says Google has fixed it. Hope this time it’s for real. The real impact won’t be [...]

    Kocchi Kade » Blog Archive » Rel=nofollow fixed says Matt Cutts - Nilhan Jayasinghe

    22nd July 2007 @ 12:20

  • 12

    Time to school Mr. Cutts, anyway I owe him one for his generosity for the past few months.
    Okay Matt, pal of my!
    How do you explain this?
    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=phsdl.net&btnG=Search

    SEOmoz | Igor Berger’s Member Profile
    URL: http://www.phsdl.net. Anti Spam project. About Igor Berger: PHP, MySql, Free Speech; Igor Berger’s favorite thing about SEO: Killfile Black Hats …
    http://www.seomoz.org/users/view/40913

    P.S. this profile is only a few days old.

    You see that nice url, it is in rel=”nofollow”

    So why is it indexed?

    Well folks I will let you know on a little secret, robots are spiders and they crawl urls text or anchor, so if you want your url crawled just set up a text link to it and a robot will do what it suppose to do…. So, Googlebot crawl http://www.igorthetroll.com

    Yahoo just indexed the Troll and I am sure Google will be next.

    Now I do not know if PR is passed and how much of it, but from my experiments with Matt blog I do not think it is much if passed at all.

    Igor The Troll

    22nd July 2007 @ 14:55

  • 13

    We need to change the title of this page to Matt’s cofirmation of Nofollow Fix is wrong!
    I have tons of pages from other Websites with an obscure anchortext Igor The Troll, using rel=”nofollow” which I just added to these Websites after Matt made his statement all indexed in Google.

    Matt, next time please do not hypothesize but give us the facts.

    Igor The Troll

    26th July 2007 @ 10:52

  • 14

    Igor you have it the wrong way round seomoz is indexed just google isn’t passing any love from that link to you. But your test is fucked already

    http://lists.trolltech.com/qt-interest/2007-07/thread00764-0.html that’s a Clean link

    DaveN

    DaveN

    26th July 2007 @ 12:15

  • 15

    Dave I never said anything about love. We are talking about indexing the strage keywords and indexing the page that is in the rel=”nofollow”

    I have seen Googlebot come to my server logs before I did a blitz on the links.
    I also have a record of Google Tools indexing a nofollow meta tag, showing links to a page that has the atribute.

    Like I said, the love juice is it passed, it is hard to say and really irelevent when it comes to Viral, but from all that I seen Google crawls the nofollow links, indexes them and indexes the title in the link as well…

    Oh and Dave, there are so many places to get the love, I do not even bother checking if there is rel=”nofollow” or not, I just do my Viral which works best for people and if they come the search engines will follow.

    So if Google wants to tell everyone do not post a link because it will not be followed, hey that is their story.

    But us as developers have to go with the gut feeling and do our job of promoting our projects and Websites.

    So if Matt wants to be right, I will concede!
    If he wants to see some nice examples of indexed rel”nofollow” strange keywords I can oblige.

    Anyway, I am tired talking Google, cause it is an infinite loop.
    So you talk mahalo.com and aftervote and I have some other bigger fish to fry! :)
    I caught me a whale and I have to reel him in…

    Igor The Troll

    26th July 2007 @ 14:17

  • 16

    [...] a few times, Google shouldn’t index nofollowed pages (accessible by nofollow links only) or give weight to nofollowed anchortext. After doing a site: query, I noticed that the page isn’t indexed. Google doesn’t even [...]

    SEO Mythbusters: Busting Google indexation myths | Wiep.net

    7th August 2007 @ 21:35

  • 17

    Does it really matter that much?
    Get a script that lets you find the follow blogs, then you are homefree…

    or make your own blog network, and use it to make your own mini-net

    Hypnose
    http://www.hypnose1.dk

    13th November 2007 @ 17:03

  • 18

    Have you got a script that you want to share with us Hypnose?

    www.practicalwebsolutions.co.uk/index.php
    http://infopracticalwebsolutions.co.uk

    20th November 2007 @ 02:25

  • 19

    This rumour will go round and round for a while yet. Here’s what I believe is the case: nofollows are in fact “followed” buy the spiders, and the target pages are duly indexed. However, no page rank juice is associated with that particular nofollow link.

    The problem is in the name of course, they should have called it: “novote” or “dontcount” or something, not nofollow.

    Colin McNulty
    http://www.colinmcnulty.com/blog/

    14th December 2007 @ 12:24

  • 20

    That was interesting… (pss.. not only the articles.. but the comments that follow as well)

    vishnu

    21st May 2008 @ 11:22

  • 21

    I beleive that Google does disregard most links that are no followed in terms of passing and link value along, but was under the impression that, in some cases, it will allow link equity to flow via a nofollowed link when it’s located on a highly regarded authority site.

    Does this still hold true then?

    Bronson Harrington

    17th September 2008 @ 10:22

  • 22

    Question for Cutts! Why does your Blog wield the no-follow attribute when you are supposed to side with all the SEO’s of the world… You’re a great big phoney! lol…

    National Credit Claims
    http://www.nationalcreditclaims.co.uk

    11th May 2009 @ 00:47

Add a Comment

*

*

*

Come and work with David Naylor and the team Subscribe
to the David Naylor feed
Follow
David Naylor's Twitter feed
View Dave's Blog