Blog

Google Begins Crackdown On Misuse Of Rich Snippets

by

There seems to be a lot of confusion recently about what is spam and what isn’t spam when it comes to rich snippets and that the confusion appears to be led by Google (go figure).

PPC Rich Snippets

Rich snippets for me are user reviews. Take the hotel industry for example:

You can see I rated this 5 stars, this is based on the fact that I have eaten there many times and had Guests stay there many times as it is my preferred Hotel when having visitors are staying in Ripon.

Others are more misleading, the example here is from PPC for “beds” it really makes Tesco looks like a great place to buy beds from based on 1,608 reviews:

But when you look at the selling rate you get:

“Drab and depressing stores with uninterested staff”

– Not quite about beds !!

“Usually you can get next day delivery and you get a text with the estimated time your shopping is going to arrive. The drivers are always friendly and helpful and with the handy shopping list, you can search for the things you need and save time :)

- more about food delivery than beds

“fruit & veg should be cheaper to aid good health by increaseing the price of juck food”

- Again Food!!

In fact I could not really find any bed reviews

Organic Rich Snippets

We’ve been seeing a lot of SEO companies using the rich Snippets, at the moment when looking at the keyword “SEO” in the UK I have 3 such companies using it:

Funnily enough they all rank top – so I guess it may possibily be a ranking factor. I can’t seen anything on schema.org or on the Google help article that says you can use the microformats on your own website and link to an external review source – but it seems like a legitimate use to me, would be great to get some clarification on Google on this as it is something I believe a lot of people would like to do.

For example if you look at SEO Creare’s source code you can see that they are referring to the Top SEO’s website – this is fine in my opinion as they are reviews referring to SEO Creare:

Just Search, however, are referencing testimonials on their own website – this is closer to how I imagine it was intended to be used:

Confusion

It would be great if Google could add some clarification on this – at the moment it’s really confusing. Can we use the same star rating in Pay Per Click as we do in organic and vice versa? Do we have to have the reviews on the actual website? And should the reviews be about the product/service in question or can it be about the organisation as a whole?


Google Begins Crackdown On Misuse of Rich Snippets

5 1

23 Comments

  • Peter Willis 506 days ago

    http://twitter.com/peter_willis

    What is the crackdown?

    Reply
    • David Whitehouse 506 days ago

      Sorry Peter, hiccup with publishing there. The spam form is here.

      And Pierre Far did a Google+ post on it here.

      Reply
  • Anthony 506 days ago

    I think the use of this should be limited to actual review websites personally, and bloggers, when individually reviewing something. I can’t see that its right for a business to control its own rating. As realistically its never going to be less than 5 stars is it..

    Reply
  • Dave 506 days ago

    Also, a “Google Review” for Places entries seems to include ratings without any review alongside the very thin 1 word reviews.

    Very deceptive, but does have the happy side effect of making it look like they have more content than Tripadvisor et al.

    Reply
  • Elaine 506 days ago

    http://www.allkids.co.uk

    yep, one of Children’s Rooms competitors has tons of customer reviews on their site – all, by the looks of it, written inhouse or by a single third party – they all, mostly sound the same, and sometimes the same review is used for different products by different customers.
    They’ve not yet started linking to them, as above – but I think they will when they discover they can, which will give them a massive advantage over honest sites.

    Reply
  • David Whitehouse 506 days ago

    Elaine, you should tip off the ASA or someone like that. Legally they should hold proof that those customers made those reviews AND gave them permission to use it, if they are making them up they’ll be in trouble!

    Reply
  • Mick 505 days ago

    http://www.electricalhub.co.uk

    I think Google are not very clear in a lot of their rules and regs.
    As to the comment from Elaine I think many sites do write their own reviews.

    Reply
  • James Finlayson 504 days ago

    http://www.redorbluedigital.com

    I’m not sure I can agree that what SEO Creare and Just Search are doing is legitimate.

    SEO Creare are referencing Top SEO’s – which I think is a good enough reason for it to be illegitimate within itself. Secondly, the reviews attached to Creare on Top SEOs look somewhat suspect in any case.

    In Just Search’s case – anyone can find a bunch of good reviews and chuck them on their website. The average searcher doesn’t know anything about schema.org and will assume that the stars are a combined independent view of the company. If what Just Search is doing is legitimate then what stops everyone from doing this – what value will rich snippets have if everyone has 5/5?

    Reply
  • James 504 days ago

    http://www.gigs20.com

    Good information, although, I also agree that many sites these days are writing their own reviews and I can’t blame them, – competition is tough these days. On the other site, Google can’t act as a police for these types of matters for ever.

    Reply
  • Ahmed 497 days ago

    http://assoftwareproducts.tk

    I agree with you that the google does not clear in a lot of their rules

    Reply
  • Alan Bleiweiss 495 days ago

    As James pointed out, SEO Creare just ties into the topSEOs site, which is NOTHING BUT FAKE REVIEWS that companies pay for. So it’s NOT acceptable, at all.

    Reply
  • Lee 494 days ago

    Looks like Creare have removed them from their site now.

    Reply
  • Chris Gedge 492 days ago

    http://www.further.co.uk
    Reply
  • Paul Gailey 492 days ago

    10 days since I reported blatant snippet spam (falsified marked up reviews) – am I being unreasonable in expectations or is Google flooded with spam reports? Are other people seeing action being taken?

    Reply
  • Ramenos 491 days ago

    http://blog.ramenos.net/

    This is bad. SEO is already a job who people as us try to protect against spam. But when i see this, this is definitvely spam for us and for users.

    More people will continue to spam users with fake reviews, more it will kill the business…*sigh*.

    By the way, thanks for this post :) .

    Reply
  • [...] course! Dave Naylor  wrote a post two months ago about slightly dodgy use of the star (review) rich snipppets he had [...]

  • [...] rich snippets were being generated. This of course then led to a lot of the abuse, and a crackdown on spam by Google allowing people to report rich snippet [...]

  • James 444 days ago

    http://www.locksmithslondonuk.com

    Fake reviews or fake markups are everywhere. I so sites with a markup saying that they have over 120 reviews, but when you check out the site there is only one or two. You can white what ever you want in the markup and Google will display it, it’s a problem for now, but it’s quite difficult to stop spammers like these.

    Reply
  • Paul Gailey 443 days ago

    http://paulgailey.com

    I feel your pain James, all I can say is diligently document it and report it via the link to Google http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/request.py?hl=en&contact_type=rich_snippets_spam

    I will add that Google did appear to take action in my case, albeit after some 5 weeks. There is no telling if it were a suppression of Rich Snippets to the offender or a stiff notice in GWMT which made the offender remove themselves.

    I would hope Google would Rich snippet suppress abusers for at least 3 months. It’s a scummy practice imho.

    Reply
  • Jennifer 389 days ago

    http://www.datalabel.co.uk

    I’m looking for a reputable Internet marketing company to optimise our website http://www.datalabel.co.uk

    Our budget is £800 per month. Please contact me if you think you can deliver.

    Thanks Jennifer

    Reply
  • Denver 355 days ago

    http://www.cosmeticdentistportland.com/

    i think you have a point there about the snippet and the tesco review. 4/5 star rating of 1600+ review. hard to determine how many are satisfied and not.

    Reply
  • findbetterclients.com 353 days ago

    http://www.findbetterclients.com/

    I have noticed that of all sorts of insurance, medical
    insurance is the most debatable because of the
    discord between the insurance plan company’s duty to remain profitable and the customer’s need to have insurance policy. Insurance companies’ commissions on health and fitness plans are certainly low, thus some providers struggle to generate income. Thanks for the suggestions you discuss through this blog.

    Reply
  • Mick Lehr 291 days ago

    http://www.knightrealm.com

    Rating with stars is always arbitrary. Tesco beds could be great and maybe it gets 2 stars or 4. And the stars could refer to service or sales and not the bed themeselves.

    Reply

Write your comment

Optional

The Bronco Family
Work With Us