SEO 101 Common Mistakes
For all the “SEO isn’t rocket science” crap you get from certain quarters it’s funny to see that companies from huge concerns down to one-man bands continue to commit the same errors they were making 10 years ago. If you’re an SEO, you could easily add to this list yourself (and I’ll have to thank the whole SEO team for chipping in about 63 ideas to bring this list to a nice round number!) If you’re a web designer who thinks that “good CSS = SEO”, a writer who thinks that “good content = SEO” or a developer who just thinks “SEO = bullshit” then here are a few pitfalls to bear in mind if you’re considering using SEO as a way to bring your products to market.
General Strategy
SEO isn’t just a discipline that exists outside the goals of your business. It should complement and be informed by wider business smarts.
- Treating onsite SEO as a ‘one-off’ project without a plan to regularly review the site – especially if your site has a high product or content rollover, or has big seasonal changes to push new messages and offers
- Changing horses mid-stream – revisiting keyword lists month by month in response to internal politics
- Not consulting existing Analytics data to identify best performing keywords
- Targeting all markets simultaneously
- Forgetting about Bing and Yahoo, where rankings and traffic can be easier to find in the short term
- Failing to understand (or convey to a client) that an SEO campaign is a long term strategy and results will not necessarily be evident in the first weeks or even months in competitive markets
- Failing to utilize universal search options for increased SERPS visibility eg images, news, blog search, product feeds etc
- Failing to work out initially if you can get a ROI from a sector you are targeting (profit margins, keyword volume etc)
- Putting SEO in a silo outside core business objectives
- Failing to include SEO input during the building of an online business plan and creating a site development spec.
Market Research
- Concentrating on trying to concentrate on acquiring the ‘same’ links as your competition
- Looking solely at offline competitors
- Not tracking industry news and events for new, fresh content ideas
- Identifying ‘competitors’ purely based on results for broad, vanity keywords
- Not using tools like Google Insight or paying for data from the likes Hitwise to identify seasonal trends
- Not using the valuable data available from a concurrent PPC campaign to monitor converting keywords
- Being unprepared to deal with social media
- Failing to deal with negative feedback and reviews online
- Failure to do your own market research through reviewing interaction with your site through Analytics, click tracking, customer surveys etc
- Failing to have any form of conversion tracking software on the site to see what keywords are the ones that you have to go after
Keywords
- Focussing on a small number of high volume ‘vanity’ terms rather than a deeper and better-converting long tail
- Allowing keyword choices on the basis of “the MD checks this every day”
- Chasing unrealistic keywords for your budget
- Choosing keywords from internal industry-speak rather than consumer-led terms with actual traffic
- Deploying brand / company name as part of a tedious “Company.co.uk – About” page title formula
- Setting too many keywords to dilute linkbuilding and content efforts
- Believing the numbers for likely traffic
- Using the “other users found this page by..” method of including misspellings and synonyms
- Forgetting that 25% of all searches have never been seen before and that search queries are typically much longer than single words
- Not reviewing keyword choices to understand where your site is failing to convert visitors and why
Content
- Copying content from other sites – potentially tripping penalties
- Stuffing content with unnatural frequencies of keywords
- Keyword “wishlists” in page titles (“UK SEO – SEO in the UK – UK SEO Agency from a UK SEO” etc)
- Duplicated meta descriptions, which encourage Google to create their own snippets which can be nonsensical and harm clickthrough rates
- Deploying content in images and Flash files
- Creating content that has no value to human readers and fails to back up your market messages
- Syndicating content to higher authority sites which are likely to be indexed before your own site and thus become canonical
- Placing a large block of keyword-stuffed “seo content” a mouse scroll below the footer on the home page
- Outsourcing content writing to the cheapest provider that you can find… you get what you pay for
- Putting text within images rather than using background images under HTML text content
Links
- Building links from a narrow range of IP addresses
- Demanding link volume rather than looking at quality
- Using more than one company to build links without co-ordination between their goals
- Buying blogroll links from sites with dozens of unrelated, anchor text links to companies in completely different markets
- Using toolbar PageRank to determine the value of a link in isolation, without considering the content of the page, quality of the domain etc
- Not re-checking link equity from established links to make sure good links haven’t gone bad
- Relying on a small number of sources for links that could be nofollowed/deleted/removed by policy at any time
- Over building links on a small set of anchor text
- Not creating links to sites and pages that already link to you naturally
- Believing that linking to the search engines or an SEO company will deliver you any benefit
Watch your URLs
- Not redirecting URLs to a canonical domain – leading to huge duplicate content issues
- Leaving the non-www version and the www live simultaneously
- Not sending correct 404 HTTP responses for broken pages
- Using long strings of variables in URLs rather than short, static URLs with a proper file extension
- Not using the correct 301 response for old content that has moved to a new URL
- Using links for territories and currencies that create duplicates of your content in all but minor ways
- Using ‘unfriendly’ characters in URLs, such as underscores instead of hypens
- Allowing the indexing of URLS with session id variables
- Not using keywords within URL structures over numbers and internal shorthand
- Having a directory structure that includes terms like ‘seo’
Channelling your Equity
- Deploying sitewide links to low-value pages such as “categories” with 1 product in them
- Linking every page to every other through an over-prescriptive menu and diluting equity spread to non-critical content
- Leaking equity to external sites by not deploying the rel=nofollow attribute
- Using ‘click here’ and ‘read more’ as default choices for internal links, rather than more descriptive phrases containing keywords where appropriate
- Not using the homepage to channel power to the most important market sectors you’re targeting
- Not using other properties you own (parent company websites, partners etc) to direct keyword equity to your target site
- Using internal nofollows to try to sculpt PageRank
- Failing to protect your site from exploits – everything from basic keyword spam in blog comments to sophisticated hacks
- Using XML sitemaps to mask poor internal link structure
- Not understanding the importance of ‘first link first’
Code
- Deploying lots of inline Javascript and CSS and increasing the site’s download time
- Keeping CSS and Javascript files on the same domain, reducing threading and increasing load times
- Leaving dozens or hundreds of ‘keywords’ in the meta keyword
- Having page titles that deploy “keyword wish lists”
- Using navigation that can only be accessed through Javascript
- Not considering the use of AJAX to bring in content and links to keep load times low and control equity spread without compromising user experience
- Serving unoptimised images with large file sizes
- Failing to label images with relevant alt attributes containing keywords as appropriate
- Serving different pages to spiders and human visitors through cloaking without an obviously justifiable reason such as personalisation
- Denying access to spiders through Robots.txt
Relationships
- Not keeping the SEO company in the loop with changes to the company’s wider strategy
- Allowing web developers to build/change things on the site willy-nilly without informing and consulting with SEO
- Changing contact points frequently so that messages and learning get lost
- Not introducing SEO agencies to other parties like offline marketing companies, PR agencies etc. This misses massive opportunities for content synergy and pooling of ideas.
- Not responding to requests for information and content
- Not ensuring that SEO recommendations are implemented as fully as possible
- Blaming SEO partners for falling traffic without first seeing if there are wider market reasons such as seasonality that could be playing a part
- Enacting SEO recommendations from other third parties without consulting with an existing SEO partner
- Being unwilling to gain a small understanding of HTML / CSS
- Not paying your SEO company!
The First Rule of SEO Club is…. “Don’t Talk About SEO Club”
- Leaving “clues” in source code like <!– This content for SEO //–>
- Using obvious file names and document structure. http://www.yoursite.com/styles/seo.css is going to attraction attention and all that “text-indent:-100em” stuff is going to highlight your hidden content pretty much off the bat.
- Having dozens of obvious keyword landing pages linked from sitewides
- Advertising the fact that you belong to a link exchange program by carrying banners that promote such schemes
- Asking for advice about SEO issues on public forums without consulting your SEO company first
- Leaving link requests in blog comments
- Creating easily identifiable networks with common IP addresses, templates and outlink profiles that have an obvious relationship with your target site
- Making sloppy link requests to bloggers who are likely to out you (hint: read their back catalogue!)
- Using automated tools to check rankings on too big a scale
- Using the same link sources for different target sites again and again
And finally….
- Don’t believe everything you read on SEO blogs 😉
72 Comments
iWoodpecker - http://www.iwoodpecker.com/
“Denying access to spiders through Robots.txt”
What did you mean here? Denying prevents from duplicate content.. usually. And that’s not that bad, I guess 🙂 Though now Google understands duplicate content better.. (more positively)
Anyways, could you explain that statement?
davide corradi - http://www.webcertain.com
lol once I found in a client website the following html comment “hidden content only for google” 😀
Kieron Hughes - http://webtoastie.co.uk
Awesome list. Bet that took a while!
DaveN
@Kieron it was a team effort really 🙂
Dave - http://www.djb31st.co.uk/
Very long post!
But some useful snippets of information to be taken away.
I especially like 90. Too many people think SEO is a one time job.. Once its done.. its done!
paul carpenter - http://www.itsafamilything.co.uk
@ Woodpecker – robots.txt issues directives to crawlers about which parts of the site should/shouldn’t be accessed and indexed. A typical mistake is to use a robots.txt on a development server to stop it getting indexed by Google and then copying it over to the live site as part of an upgrade.
What you’re talking about (the duplicate content stuff) is more a question of using the rel=canonical tag or, more fundamentally, just making sure you manage your URLs properly in the first place 🙂
Steven Holmes - http://www.dotcomdigital.co.uk
# 90 is my particular favourite.
I’d like to elaborate on that by saying “don’t request your SEO company/consultant to do something if you haven’t paid your previous invoice”
iWoodpecker - http://www.iwoodpecker.com/
wow.. in 10 minutes 40 tweets – the article went viral? 🙂
Paul,
Thanks for the explanation!
Andy Dawson (Blue Snapper) - http://www.bluesnapper.com/blog
Great list – I’ll save it for future reference. I would add one more:
– Not regularly running a link validator to identify broken links and ‘duplicate’ content ie same page but different urls.
Recently, a test on a client site found about 35% of its urls were doubling up and pointing to the same pages due to breadcrumbs using paths. Google rankings improved substantially following a clean-up.
I hear the ‘SEO is not rocket science’ a lot. True, but then why isn’t everybody pos. 1 for their chosen term?
Andy
steveplunkett - http://blog.mccom.com
Wow… wonderful article… great job.. could not find one i didn’t agree with… again.. wow.. great, great list.
a qualified candidate for seo blog post of the year…
Kean - http://www.keanrichmond.com
Nice work team, but I have one to add…
#102 Creating an SEO strategy without considering design and usability of the website. Getting eyeballs is one thing, getting the conversion is another.
Dave
Thanks for the list, useful stuff! Quick question though about No. 63…
Leaking equity to external sites by not deploying the rel=nofollow attribute
I though Matt Cutts stated that adding the nofollow attribute wouldn’t stop the leaking of equity from your site, instead it would just evaporate, thereby meaning link consolidation the new link sculpting?
Rob Camp - http://www.juretic.com
I can think of a few people I could hand some or all of this stuff to. Thanks for putting it together and sharing it.
A couple of the coding points are personal food for thought.
Greg Power - http://www.twitter.com/gregpower
Dave, see point 101 😉
maurice - http://hauntingthunder.wordpress.com/
@iWoodpecker
I have seen well meaning clients block every page on thier site by misusing robots.tst
Axisadman - http://www.axis.co.uk
Great article – particularly if you believe point 101!
Gareth - http://www.seo-doctor.co.uk/
” concentrate on acquiring the ’same’ links as your competition”
I’ve seen so many sites chasing after their competitors crap links, its a joke. Especially when they are paid and £££ per month.
Carla - http://www.sorbetdigital.com
You missed one……..:-)
Richard Hostler - http://www.richardhostler.com
I blushed a couple time while reading this. Nice job compiling the list.
Sourav Sharma - http://www.souravsharma.com/blog/
Excellent pots..
I have seen many cases where management don’t trust the SEO companies and expect them to do miracles in first starting months.
One of the common problem which SEO’s face is being not in the loop of the site change.
I still remember my last job where I had to fight and stay on top of the stuff which design team used to update on the site.
Yayki
9. “Putting SEO in a silo…” Sounds like something right out of Ol’ Bruce Clay Playbook
Amelia Vargo
I’ve made a few of these mistakes in the past. Have to say there isn’t one I disagree with. Great list – I’ve sent the url to all my colleagues so we can all learn from you!
Springboard SEO - http://www.springboardseo.com
Well thought out article – I appreciated the structure as well.
Would have liked to see lots of internal links to relevant articles of yours though – would take it from a 101 list to a resources!
Great read, all in all!
John Scott Cothill
“” – I’ve also seen a large UK eRetailer have the word /seo/ in the URL structure. Ahhh, fail whale! (Funny though).
That was a brilliant read, thanks Paul.
Paul Evison
Agency Mistakes with Relationships from the client’s side…
a. Don’t be surprised if your suggestions aren’t understood or liked by the MD and that he ensures that your work is undermined and inadequetly implemented. He cares not for you and your mystical ways and he can’t for the life of him fathom why you’re charging so much “before you’ve proved yourself”. And he likes Flash so you obviously don’t know what you’re talking about. And you’ve turned up in bad suit.
b. Don’t ring the client’s marketing manager if your invoice is paid late (again), he might be a be a bit embarrassed but ultimatley he doesn’t care because he has other things to worry about and knows you’ll tolerate it as long as you’re eventually paid. All invoices are paid late because the company considers itself big enough to get way with it. Accept this. Or bother the less important person in accounts who’s paid to fob you off for a bit longer.
c. Just because you’re waiting for some information or content doesn’t mean you can stop work altogether (and get something done for another client). There’s plenty of other things to be getting on with and we know what you’re up to.
d. We’re deliberatley keeping the wider strategy from you. It changes so often that it becomes embarrassing contradicting what was said at the last meeting.
e. We’re not going to allow any “content synergy” with the sexy girls from the PR agency in London. You’re from Wakefield and will scare them…
Chris Peterson
Yap, you are right all SEO guys always done such type of mistakes. Most important facts are on-page optimization and coding. They are developing lots coding without following search engine guideline. Without proper on-page optimization they are doing lots of link building work as result their website goes to bane.
Your article will teach directly or indirectly to solve their mistakes.
Robert - http://www.propdata.net/
Some great points, but I think number 82 is the one that gets to me most of all. Nothing quite like seeing changes on a site without anybody discussing it with you.
rishil - http://explicitly.me
LOl. Love the list. Although #22 isnt a mistake, its a the way into a higher pay cheque if you play your cards right
paul carpenter - http://www.itsafamilything.co.uk
You are a terrible cynic, Rishil!
dave - http://www.salesandmarketingforums.co.uk
Great list do you mind if I post it up on my site?
Cheers
Dave
Colin
Haha that was a fantastic list and a good read.
Pleasantly surprised.
Robert - http://www.propdata.net/
Hahahaha… actually I kind of have to side with Rishil on that one. A fool and their money… 😛
Some search basics (Small Business E-commerce Link Digest – January 22, 2010) - pingback
[…] course, sometimes knowing what not to do is more important. Fortunately, Dave Naylor’s 101 common SEO mistakes can help with […]
Chuck Reynolds - http://rynoweb.com
good list… love #101 😉
Gareth Brown - http://www.evolution-Internet.com
Excellent post, you have to love MDs! There’s nothing worst than trying to rank for a term that’s never going to generate traffic. But sometimes we end up doing some terms, just to keep them happy…the customer is always right!
Phil Van Treuren - http://www.killercampaigning.com
There’s some great stuff here, especially for those of us who tend to focus too much on linkbuilding and not enough on general strategy and market research. Retweeting it, thanks!
James Svoboda - http://www.realicity.com/
Great list. I’m going to have my newbee read it!
101 SEO Common mistakes | Web AddiCT(s); - pingback
[…] more of the SEO 101 mistakes? For the full list of SEO mistakes made by all visit Dave Naylor. Have you read these yet?Nice Try Ananzi Why Google was a top searched keyword on Ananzi in […]
Patrick Kelly - http://www.patrickkelly.co.uk
Brilliant post, I’ve already recommended it to many of my friends and clients.
As a web trainer I see all sorts of potential SEO nightmares on my travels. Hopefully this article will act as a splendid starting point for discusssion.
Brilliant Post About Common SEO Mistakes — Patrick Kelly - IT Trainer and Consultant - pingback
[…] http://www.davidnaylor.co.uk/seo-101-common-mistakes.html […]
NGT Web Site Design
I thought the advise was not to use this anymore:
Leaking equity to external sites by not deploying the rel=nofollow attribute
Robert - http://www.propdata.net/
@ NGT: I think the rel=nofollow attribute should pretty much be relegated to blog comments. If you really are trying to shape PageRank, there are other ways which you have much more control of.
Phil @ NetInspired Web Design - http://netinspired.com
Great article although a little confusing at first as its from the perspective of what you *shouldn’t* do. I know, I know, I should have paid more attention to the article title; but I can’t help but thinking it would be easier to read if it was from a positive perspective of what you *should* do.
Thanks for putting in the leg-work, we’ll be sure to make use of this in our client projects at NetInspired
Robert - http://www.propdata.net/
@ Phil, you make an interesting point. But I think the list of what not to do is much shorter.
Weekly Search & Social News: 01/26/2010 | Search Engine Journal - pingback
[…] SEO 101 Common Mistakes – I’m not a fan of lists, but when we come across a HUGE one like this, it simply can’t be over-looked. What made it more interesting is the guys on Dave Naylor’s blog tend to have more ‘quick hit’, drive by blogging posts most of the time. Nice work! […]
Mohan Arun L - http://mohanarun.com
I couldnt understand #70. What do you mean by “first link first”?
Richard Petersen » Blog Archive » Weekly Search & Social News:Â 01/26/2010 - pingback
[…] SEO 101 Common Mistakes – I’m not a fan of lists, but when we come across a HUGE one like this, it simply can’t be over-looked. What made it more interesting is the guys on Dave Naylor’s blog tend to have more ‘quick hit’, drive by blogging posts most of the time. Nice work! […]
Ruben - http://rsanchez.info
good list… thx!
Links der Woche (KW 03, 2010) - Affiliate-Marketing.de Blog - pingback
[…] – SEO 101 Common Mistakes Paul Carpenter ist darüber amüsiert, dass sowohl große Firmen als auch kleine […]
De mest almindelige SEO-misforståelser | Søren Holm - pingback
[…] her – der er også en række tekniske som er rigtig gode (og rigtig udbredte i øvrigt): SEO 101 Common Mistakes Gem eller del med […]
Wouter Blom | Zoekmachine Marketing - http://www.stramark.nl/
also common mistake: Leaving the full SEO efford to the technicians…
Common SEO Mistakes to Avoid - pingback
[…] a more extensive list of common SEO Mistakes check out David Naylor ‘SEO 101 Common Mistakes‘ article. Related PostsYes, there can be too much of a good thing, and that includes […]
maryan - http://warungblogger.com
thanks for your info. it’s great articles but i don’t understand about point 70.
Fantastic SEO, Social Media and Internet Marketing Articles I found on Twitter in the past week - SEO Aware - pingback
[…] SEO 101 Common Mistakes […]
25 Must-Read Articles For Bloggers | Sammy Nams - pingback
[…] SEO 101 Common Mistakes […]
SEO 101 Common Mistakes | Rapid Shoots Journey - pingback
[…] Concentrating on trying to concentrate on acquiring the ’same’ links as your competition; Looking solely at offline competitors; Not tracking industry news and events for new, fresh content ideas; Identifying ‘competitors’ purely based on results ….. SEO 101 Common Mistakes – I’m not a fan of lists, but when we come across a HUGE one like this, it simply can’ t be over-looked. What made it more interesting is the guys on Dave Naylor’s blog tend to have more ‘quick hit’, … View original post here: SEO 101 Common Mistakes […]
Rob - http://www.web-design-talk.co.uk
Very nice article. Particvularly liked #90 🙂
3TAJIOH - http://www.3TAJIOH.ru
Who can translate #62 into Russian language please?
Levi Roots
Carps man, you missed out a vital SEO tip:
“Never report one of your own clients to Google”
Webmoves - http://www.webmoves.nl/
I recommend that people always use their own content. Google loves new content! That’s how you get picked up by Google because that’s what they want other people to find. The newest en best information on the web.
SysComm - http://www.syscomminternational.com/blog
One of the most detailed list I found until now on SEO! Really great!!
Pelle - http://www.s-h.nl/
Great article.
SEO is opaque. Because know body knows exactly what we have to do there is always space for a discussion.
I stop believing everything in blogs a long time ago..
SEPo
Excellent article !
SEPo - http://www.webfinderpro.co.uk/
sorry – dropped my personal email in last post can u remove please
Mike Brandino - http://www.localbusinessmarketingexpert.com
This is a great list… a few things may be just a little over the top… but it really does serve to let people know they don’t know as much about SEO as they’d like to think… great job…
I may just “borrow” some of this information… thanks again!
sarah - http://seo-blogger-tips.blogspot.com/
think that the quality of contents, quality of links, quality of “good neighbours” are essential to have a good page rank,
This is great to create a good, qualitative, product.
Buying links is not honest.
Extremely helpful information. Thank you!
The most common SEO misconceptions | Søren Holm - pingback
[…] here – there are also a number of technical one which are really good (and very common): SEO 101 Common Mistakes Gem eller del med […]
101 SEO Mistakes | LenderTech SEO & Web Solutions - pingback
[…] Fantastic list by Paul Carpenter: http://www.davidnaylor.co.uk/seo-101-common-mistakes.html […]
andrew - http://www.theexpertseocompany.com
Good list guys, I actually learned something here, especially from #101
Cheers
Bronson - http://www.bronsonharrington.com
No way, I was just researching “Top SEO Mistakes to Avoid” when I hot your blog and this rather extensive article.
Awesome work guys, I will leave you a trackback when I eventually get around to publishing my article.
Dave
This is a brilliant list! Nice to see some people appreciate how in depth seo is – and that it must be part of your overall efforts – it’s not just an seo team working in seclusion. Great stuff!!
Nisha Shah - http://www.xportsoft.com
Awesome List. Nice Sharing.