Manipulating Google+ for Fun and Maybe Profit…
On Friday I did a post about Google’s Authorship affect on rankings and this morning I was replying to some comments and checking to see how well it had done etc. and noticed something interesting; the Google+ shares was higher than both FaceBook and Twitter combined! After digging into the analytics with Dave we noticed that the traffic driven from G+ was significantly lower than Twitter yet the number of shares was higher (about 100 more shares…at the time). See screen shot below:
Date range 7th – 10th Feb

Now why would this be? Surely Twitter should have the most shares??
The number of G+ shares this morning was at 251, take a look now. At the time of writing, it’s currently at 381. We inflated this number ourselves! Within about 10 minutes we had risen this number by 51%! It turns out Google are counting everything towards the total share number, this includes shares, comments and plus 1’s.
We simply opened up Google+ and searched for the post and then ran though all the shares and plus 1’d them, along with some of the comments too (See all the red highlighted +1’s below).

Now this is just my account, you could run through this with your entire team and add follow up comments for each and maybe even set up multiple pages and use them to inflate the number further.
Try it for yourself, check the current G+ share count on this post and then go to this search page while signed into Google+ and +1 a few of the shares and then refresh the post and you’ll see the figure climb.
I can only assume Google are doing this so they appear bigger than they actually are to get more buy-in from bloggers etc. and if they are using this towards their algorithm in any way, then it’s an easy way to manipulate it. Not that we’d do that 🙂
3 Comments
Danny Richman - http://www.seotraininglondon.org
I would suspect that the additional share count is unlikely to have any impact on organic SERPs on the basis that Google would have first-hand knowledge of how easily this could be manipulated. An interesting discovery but with no real benefits
Craig Addyman
Hey Danny, If that’s the case then yes that’s fair enough but this book would suggest otherwise “Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion”
Henry Hernandez - http://www.texaseo.com/
Thanks for the insight Craig. It’s crazy and “weird” to see Google attempting to inflate their numbers. Ok, not really. They are savages.