07 Jan 2008

wikia search

wikia search what do you think ?

wikia search

DaveN

25 Comments

  • 1

    1996 I would say WOW
    1998 hmmm but Google is better
    2000 does this still works?
    2008 they launch that crap as a product? is it some money laundering or what?

    tom ford | http://www.fragrantica.com/

    7th January 2008 @ 12:07

  • 2

    Rome wasn’t built in a day. Anybody slating a new search engine in the first few weeks of alpha is being too harsh. Give it a year and see how it goes. I like the way it shows my face when you search for my site, Google doesn’t do that.

    Patrick Altoft | http://blogstorm.co.uk

    7th January 2008 @ 12:12

  • 3

    Patrick It’s not a new search engine thou… it’s Nutch.

    DaveN

    DaveN

    7th January 2008 @ 12:22

  • 4

    I understand they are still building in Rome today? ;)

    Dan Horton | http://www.bronco.co.uk

    7th January 2008 @ 12:26

  • 5

    [...] struggling to understand the benefits to be honest. But as someone’s just commented at DaveN’s blog, Rome wasn’t built in a day. However I’m sure the Roman’s had better [...]

  • PPCBlogger | http://www.ppcblog.co.uk

    7th January 2008 @ 12:36

  • 7

    I quite like the people matching part too as this makes it a bit different from normal search engines.

    The results really are awful at the moment though, looks like using keywords in your domain works pretty well :)
    http://re.search.wikia.com/search#search%20engine%20marketing

    Kevin Gibbons | http://www.seoptimise.com

    7th January 2008 @ 12:50

  • 8

    I like the way the page retains the earlier listed results and erm … the colour schemes nice, very web 2.0.

    Not sure about the results they seem a bit scattered.

    Paul-S | http://www.northsouthmedia.co.uk/

    7th January 2008 @ 13:44

  • 9

    Nutch. :-)

    Johann | http://johannburkard.de

    7th January 2008 @ 14:49

  • 10

    hmmm, slight problem with duplicates http://re.search.wikia.com/search#ruby%20on%20rails

    Anonymous

    7th January 2008 @ 15:17

  • 11

    Seems to have big problems with duplicates
    http://re.search.wikia.com/search#ruby%20on%20rails

    stu | http://www.webmasterwords.com

    7th January 2008 @ 15:18

  • 12

    That has got to be the best use of their logo I’ve seen thus far!

    Farmer

    7th January 2008 @ 15:30

  • 13

    I am just looking at it now. The first few searches look pretty bad. I am signing up for account right now to see how I can use it to my advantage. :)

    Dave Dugdale | http://www.rentvine.com/

    7th January 2008 @ 15:49

  • 14

    Doesn’t handle the long tail to well. So far, it’s not setting the world on fire.

    Terry Reeves | http://www.terryreeves.com/michigan-seo.shtml

    7th January 2008 @ 16:02

  • 15

    [...] asked what people think of Wikia Search, and I can’t say anything else but: crap. The results are crap, [...]

  • 16

    [...] asked what people think of Wikia Search, and I can’t say anything else but: crap. The results are crap, [...]

  • 17

    14 million dollars and the result are lame. I hope they can get it together soon.
    FYI: The press release for Wikia outranks wikipedia.org for the word wiki.

    Ken Teegardin | http://www.iso9000resources.com/

    7th January 2008 @ 23:52

  • 18

    Does anyone know how similar Nutch is to Google’s infrastructure? For all I know it could be like comparing apples to oranges but who knows..

    Adam Moro | http://adammoro.net/

    8th January 2008 @ 00:16

  • 19

    When they start sending me loads of traffic it will be time to sit up and take notice…. Good luck to them.

    Fireblade

    8th January 2008 @ 01:45

  • 20

    Adam Moro:
    Nutch uses hadoop, which is almost a direct clone of the Google file system and Map-reduce.

    Bigtable (the google database) isn’t quite completely ported yet though.

    The actual ranking algorithms are quite different, IMO, though.

    Tim Wintle | http://timtimwintle.co.uk

    8th January 2008 @ 14:51

  • 21

    I havent seen alot of it, it’s a nice concept in a perfect world, but am I wrong in saying the results are best on user votes? If so arent SEO companys just going to be voting clients highly on multiple accounts?
    & thus the rich get richer? ^_^

    Dann | http://www.dannsmith.co.uk

    10th January 2008 @ 18:30

  • 22

    [...] but it just could provide some clarity on Google’s core abilities. Apparently, “Nutch uses hadoop, which is almost a direct clone of the Google file system and Map-reduce.” To me that sounds like gold in an industry based on [...]

    Rise of the Search Engines

    12th January 2008 @ 05:02

  • 23

    [...] de resultaten in de toekomst echter beter gaan worden vraag ik me af. Tot die tijd blijf ik me toch gewoon richten op [...]

    Wikia Search | SEO blog

    13th January 2008 @ 16:32

  • 24

    I dont believe in the concept. And till now, the results are crap.
    I dont think this will be a lot better in the future.

    Seto Blog | http://www.seoblog.nl

    13th January 2008 @ 16:34

  • 25

    If I look for the term SEO on a dutch browser I get Chinese results?
    Even a monkey could do better.

    Seo Blog | http://www.seotaal.nl

    13th January 2008 @ 16:36

Write a Comment

*

*

*

Hear me speak at SES London 2010 Subscribe
to the David Naylor feed
Follow
David Naylor's Twitter feed

View Dave's Blog