1996 I would say WOW
1998 hmmm but Google is better
2000 does this still works?
2008 they launch that crap as a product? is it some money laundering or what?
Rome wasn’t built in a day. Anybody slating a new search engine in the first few weeks of alpha is being too harsh. Give it a year and see how it goes. I like the way it shows my face when you search for my site, Google doesn’t do that.
[...] struggling to understand the benefits to be honest. But as someone’s just commented at DaveN’s blog, Rome wasn’t built in a day. However I’m sure the Roman’s had better [...]
[...] asked what people think of Wikia Search, and I can’t say anything else but: crap. The results are crap, [...]
Ken Teegardin 1990 days ago
http://www.iso9000resources.com/
14 million dollars and the result are lame. I hope they can get it together soon.
FYI: The press release for Wikia outranks wikipedia.org for the word wiki.
I havent seen alot of it, it’s a nice concept in a perfect world, but am I wrong in saying the results are best on user votes? If so arent SEO companys just going to be voting clients highly on multiple accounts?
& thus the rich get richer? ^_^
[...] but it just could provide some clarity on Google’s core abilities. Apparently, “Nutch uses hadoop, which is almost a direct clone of the Google file system and Map-reduce.” To me that sounds like gold in an industry based on [...]
tom ford 1991 days ago
http://www.fragrantica.com/1996 I would say WOW
1998 hmmm but Google is better
2000 does this still works?
2008 they launch that crap as a product? is it some money laundering or what?
Patrick Altoft 1991 days ago
Rome wasn’t built in a day. Anybody slating a new search engine in the first few weeks of alpha is being too harsh. Give it a year and see how it goes. I like the way it shows my face when you search for my site, Google doesn’t do that.
DaveN 1991 days ago
Patrick It’s not a new search engine thou… it’s Nutch.
DaveN
Dan Horton 1991 days ago
http://www.bronco.co.ukI understand they are still building in Rome today?
Wikia Search Review - First Impressions 1991 days ago
[...] struggling to understand the benefits to be honest. But as someone’s just commented at DaveN’s blog, Rome wasn’t built in a day. However I’m sure the Roman’s had better [...]
PPCBlogger 1991 days ago
http://www.ppcblog.co.ukGreat results -
http://re.search.wikia.com/search#seo
Kevin Gibbons 1991 days ago
http://www.seoptimise.comI quite like the people matching part too as this makes it a bit different from normal search engines.
The results really are awful at the moment though, looks like using keywords in your domain works pretty well
http://re.search.wikia.com/search#search%20engine%20marketing
Paul-S 1991 days ago
http://www.northsouthmedia.co.uk/I like the way the page retains the earlier listed results and erm … the colour schemes nice, very web 2.0.
Not sure about the results they seem a bit scattered.
Johann 1991 days ago
http://johannburkard.deNutch.
Anonymous 1991 days ago
hmmm, slight problem with duplicates http://re.search.wikia.com/search#ruby%20on%20rails
stu 1991 days ago
http://www.webmasterwords.comSeems to have big problems with duplicates
http://re.search.wikia.com/search#ruby%20on%20rails
Farmer 1991 days ago
That has got to be the best use of their logo I’ve seen thus far!
Dave Dugdale 1991 days ago
http://www.rentvine.com/I am just looking at it now. The first few searches look pretty bad. I am signing up for account right now to see how I can use it to my advantage.
Terry Reeves 1991 days ago
http://www.terryreeves.com/michigan-seo.shtmlDoesn’t handle the long tail to well. So far, it’s not setting the world on fire.
Wikia Search: Crap - SEO - Joost de Valk's SEO Blog 1991 days ago
[...] asked what people think of Wikia Search, and I can’t say anything else but: crap. The results are crap, [...]
Wikia Search: Crap - SEO - Joost de Valk's SEO Blog 1991 days ago
[...] asked what people think of Wikia Search, and I can’t say anything else but: crap. The results are crap, [...]
Ken Teegardin 1990 days ago
http://www.iso9000resources.com/14 million dollars and the result are lame. I hope they can get it together soon.
FYI: The press release for Wikia outranks wikipedia.org for the word wiki.
Adam Moro 1990 days ago
http://adammoro.net/Does anyone know how similar Nutch is to Google’s infrastructure? For all I know it could be like comparing apples to oranges but who knows..
Fireblade 1990 days ago
When they start sending me loads of traffic it will be time to sit up and take notice…. Good luck to them.
Tim Wintle 1990 days ago
http://timtimwintle.co.ukAdam Moro:
Nutch uses hadoop, which is almost a direct clone of the Google file system and Map-reduce.
Bigtable (the google database) isn’t quite completely ported yet though.
The actual ranking algorithms are quite different, IMO, though.
Dann 1988 days ago
http://www.dannsmith.co.ukI havent seen alot of it, it’s a nice concept in a perfect world, but am I wrong in saying the results are best on user votes? If so arent SEO companys just going to be voting clients highly on multiple accounts?
& thus the rich get richer? ^_^
Rise of the Search Engines 1986 days ago
[...] but it just could provide some clarity on Google’s core abilities. Apparently, “Nutch uses hadoop, which is almost a direct clone of the Google file system and Map-reduce.” To me that sounds like gold in an industry based on [...]
Wikia Search | SEO blog 1985 days ago
[...] de resultaten in de toekomst echter beter gaan worden vraag ik me af. Tot die tijd blijf ik me toch gewoon richten op [...]
Seto Blog 1985 days ago
http://www.seoblog.nlI dont believe in the concept. And till now, the results are crap.
I dont think this will be a lot better in the future.
Seo Blog 1985 days ago
http://www.seotaal.nlIf I look for the term SEO on a dutch browser I get Chinese results?
Even a monkey could do better.