« Alexa’s Sponsored Links
Adcenter Needs your help »

Seomoz

I can’t tell if Rand has done this or someone else has, but these serps for SEOMOZ are really really bad. imo

check out Seomoz on google.co.uk

Screen Shot :

Seomoz

Ok he is my spin on this why I think it’s Bad,

1) Seomoz this is the snippet test, just to prove a point, I will blog about it once it kicks in :) Dave - Friday 3rd August

has great content and gives good advice, not many people will be knocking them
2) But having :

seomoz
dns-tools.domaintools.com/?q=www.seomoz.org&m=ping

seomoz
del.icio.us/search/?fr=del_icio_us&p=seomoz.org&type=all

seomoz
www.newsvine.com/_vine/search?q=seomoz&searchIn=x -

seomoz
jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=www.seomoz.org&usermedium=all

seomoz
tailrank.com/posts/find/?q=seomoz

actually does Seomoz a great in justice.

3) on the plus side if you had a site saying something bad about Seomoz, then it’s a master stroke

DaveN

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Reddit
  • Technorati

12 Comments | Leave a comment »

  1. 1. Wicked Keemo | July 27th 2007 @ 4:45 pm

    “on the plus side if you had a site saying something bad about Seomoz, then it’s a master stroke”
    You mean like your blog Dave? :P

  2. 2. Jeremy Luebke | July 27th 2007 @ 5:26 pm

    Looks like a pure Reputation Management play to me. Just covering their bases just in case maybe.

  3. 3. XRide | July 28th 2007 @ 4:12 pm

    now you’re 3rd in google uk and 4th in google.com ;-)

  4. 4. Phantombookman | July 28th 2007 @ 5:30 pm

    Dave
    I see they have the navigational extra links under their main spot.
    Shoemoney had them a while ago and now i notice you too have them - I think it’s recent so congratulations !
    Do we (when I say ‘we’ I mean is it ‘out’ I’m sure certain people know only too well ;) ) know exactly what triggers it ? Authority, traffic etc
    I know one site that has them and is just PR3 and I know their traffic is not particularly heavy.

    Anyway, congrats on getting them, they say ‘authority’ to me whenever I come across them in serps and I think layman think the same as well
    Best
    Rod

  5. 5. Phantombookman | July 28th 2007 @ 5:33 pm

    PS, seeing tha Matt doesn’t have them would it be reasonable to guess site layout can influence it as well ?

  6. 6. Eric | July 29th 2007 @ 1:17 am

    Of course I am guessing the vast majority of their traffic is from type ins - at least in the SEO community.

  7. 7. Jeremy Luebke | July 31st 2007 @ 5:22 pm

    This post is the cause

    http://www.seomoz.org/blog/a-list-of-every-website-statistic-publicly-available

    Add a couple scrapers later and you have rank. Doesn’t take much more than one good links with a few bad ones piled on to get a page ranking on an authority domain.

  8. 8. randfish | July 31st 2007 @ 6:18 pm

    I’m tempted to turn the links on that post nofollow and see what happens…

  9. 9. Igor The Troll | July 31st 2007 @ 6:49 pm

    Rand you stalking me. :)

  10. 10. DaveN | August 1st 2007 @ 9:18 am

    Hey Rand that would be a test, But I bet other have linked to one or more of those by now.. we could do a super secret test :)

    But it’s still a Great example on how to RankBlock tailgaters unless they have authority like me.

    Dave

  11. 11. Igor The Troll | August 4th 2007 @ 3:10 pm

    Is that like who will get more applauds at London SES…

    RandF vs. DaveN

    Definitely need to see. Two great guys in their own ranks..

    Matt C. can be the moderator…

  12. 12. DavidNaylor.co.uk | August 15th 2007 @ 3:23 pm

    […] DavidNaylor.co.uk did this test on SEOMOZ but lets see what happens when i post a snipped of DavidNaylor.co.uk on my blog to see […]

Leave a Reply

required

required, hidden