Archive for the ‘Internet Marketing’ Category

If you use TLA read this..

you know that Google is hunting and killing sites…

do this search : Google

so you can see 2,800,000 blogs wp-content folder ( this is a standard googledork )

how hard would it be for Google to write a script where basically do this…

open folder : http://www.blogherald.com/wp-content/plugins/

fuzzy logic search for TLA_ which would return http://www.blogherald.com/wp-content/plugins/tla_44565.php

yep thats the TLA plugin … banned !

DaveN

Messing with Digg

These are my 3 my Favourite messing with Digg tricks.. remember most diggers are stupid

1) The 301 redirect to another page.

Basically you 301 the page that’s been dugg to another page, with a Digg button, because most people Digg after they have left Digg and landed on your page

2) The wrong Digg button

basically you just replace the digg button on the landing page to another digg page. I have seen this method used very very well. you get your “5 cool things about firefox” on the front page of digg then on the landing page you put a digg button to you next upcoming article.

3) the on-exit

small bit of JS so when they leave the page it Digg’s it for you :)

DaveN

Will Phorm kill Google UK

In the darker belly of the Internet world there are rumours that Phorm may replace ad’s by Google with it own ad’s… worried no of course you aren’t, after all Phorm is just the rebrand of 121media ( I think that was malware )

so what’s with the title of this post, well 70% or the UK internet users will have to opt out yes opt out, you see that Phorm as signed deals with BT, Talk Talk and Virgin, so now are you scared. if you thought that Zuckerberg’s Beacon was bad.. this is worse ..

well what could Phorm do

from the webwise site :

Advertising that’s relevant to your interests
Webwise assigns a unique, randomly-generated number in a cookie to a customer’s browser to preserve anonymity, then matches the categories of browsing activity with advertising. When there is a match the customer sees the more-relevant ad.

What if you where running adsense, they could just block that and replace it with a more relevant ad.

What if you where reading the FT and they mentioned Expedia and hotels in Paris, and phorm could add a link to lastminute if they wanted to or even a Banner ad.

What if the profile they built on you was leaked, I’m sure the UK are pretty good at not leaking Data ..

and what if when you searched Google you got Phorm ads and Not adwords, has and adwords advertiser that would piss me off ..

at the moment I can’t tell if the Webwise add on will deactivate the Phorm ads or not time will tell I guess.

webwise

btw BT just testing this on 10,000 people …

Bad peoples sites
http://www.phorm.com/
http://www.webwise.com/

related articles
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/mar/06/internet.privacy
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7280791.stm

DaveN

Ross Caveille ContextWeb’s New UK General Manager Interview Dan Horton SEO

Inline with ContextWeb’s expansion  ADSDAQ Ad Exchange to the UK, Ross Caveille has just been announced as the new UK general manager. I welcomed the opportunity to interview him:

1) What are your immediate thoughts about the newly created position ?

 My thoughts are it’s great, it’s an opportunity for ContextWeb’s ADSDAQ Exchange to launch into a new market and hopefully use this as a stepping stone into additional European markets in the future. I am excited about being a part of this and hope to replicate the success over here that ContextWeb has enjoyed in the US.

2) With a mission of  reaching  the exchange’s audiences of UK visitors, what is your main strategy for achieving this?

 As in the US we will work with large and small UK publishers alike and promote the use of the ADSDAQ Exchange’s self-serve portal.   With over 5,000 publishers already in the exchange to date, we look forward to continued momentum in the UK. Also, strategic partnerships will be formed with key publishers in the UK market in order to generate sufficient reach across content rich web pages.  

3) What do you hope to bring to the new role ?

Having been involved with the UK digital market for over six years I hope to be able to bring experience and knowledge of this environment plus and instant introduction to ContextWeb and the ADSDAQ Exchange with key industry figures. I am also extremely excited about establishing the Company within the UK and will be channeling this energy into growing the business.

4) With such a global audience how will you focus in your mission ?

 Initially, we will be establishing the ADSDAQ Exchange in the UK and campaigns will be UK-focused so we will be working closely with advertisers targeting UK IPs. The UK marketplace is predominantly London oriented but does have a strong presence in Manchester and Leeds so these three areas will be key.

5) Your experience at Microsoft must have some influence in the business decisions that you make. What are your thoughts about their current plans to acquire Yahoo and indeed develop their market within search ?

 There is a lot of consolidation happening in the market right now and this is not just specific to Microsoft or Google. However, as these two big players size one another up it is imperative that Microsoft make some inroads into Google’s dominance of search as it is clear that Google will be aggressively expanding into display. There are probably additional attractions to the acquisition for Microsoft, with mobile being a likely consideration, but I am happy for this power struggle to continue and let us focus on providing our clients with cutting edge technology and superior service levels.

6)  How do you foresee the technology market evolving within the next five years ?

 The UK market is a little behind the US, however, not as much as it used to be. Exchanges are a relatively new addition to the online marketing mix and I foresee that this will eventually be the platform of choice for the majority of advertisers and publishers alike. Previously and - to a great extent - currently, technology platforms are quite stand-alone and tend to not work well or at all with other technologies of a similar offering e.g. adserving tends to be Atlas or DoubleClick but rarely an amalgamation of the two. I wish I could predict the future but I would hope new technologies will be about control and mutual benefit, for all sides of the equation rather than the proprietor. 

7) Currently, advertisers and publishers have complete control. Is this an area you feel will change in the near future ?

 I would actually suggest that currently, advertisers and publishers do not have complete control. Often an advertiser will not have control over which page they appear on, the format that appears or the frequency in which this happens. Similarly, a publisher can stipulate which advertisers they would like or exclude certain brands but will rarely be in full control of volumes to advertiser. In both instances I am talking about advertisers and publishers that have enough scale to be represented by a third party, whether this be an advertising agency or sales house. The shift to an exchange platform does increase the control that an advertiser and publisher has in particularly if this is at the page-level which is what is so appealing about ADSDAQ by ContextWeb. I hope this trend increases in the future and control is given to both publishers and advertisers alike. Technology has a key role to play in this.

8) With such success of the business within the US market. How do you think this will compare to the UK market ?

 Seeing as though we are three days old in the UK I will be in a better position to answer this further down the line. But, the minds that made ContextWeb a success in the US are fully supportive of the UK launch and I hope to be able to work as closely as possible with these people to replicate this.

9) Who do you see as the main competition in reaching the exchange’s audiences of UK visitors ?

 You could argue that any vendor wishing to acquire advertising budget or publisher inventory is a competitor and indeed at some point they all probably will be. There are exchanges and contextual targeting tools available for advertisers in the UK now however each has its own platform, degree of targeting that it can achieve and USP. The general lack of understanding of what an exchange is and how to best make use of it is also something that will take time to overcome so as much as it is about gaining a foothold in the marketplace it is also important that vendors of all walks take the care and attention to educate as they grow. 

Thanks very much for your time Ross.

 Dan Horton SEO           

Text Link Ads Silver Bullet or Poisoned Chalice

well I’m back from SES New York.. and as the parties still rage on, I had time to think about Text link Ads.

links

I still see some sites ranking really well by just buying links via Text Link Ads, but more and more I’m seeing death and destruction, while confusion remains supreme and equality seems so far away what do you do?

In New York, for the first time I publicly said that “Buying Links just isn’t worth the risk”, in fact I even went as far to say it’s becoming the new blog spam in the internet world..

Buy expired domain with some Pagerank ( helps when buying links )
Buy 20 - 40 pages or so of quality content, around or near to the target subject.
Buy links, then 301 or cloak 301 to your spam site.

or

Just buy links for your competitor but don’t report them, just report the sites that are selling the Links, so that you keep your industry out of the Loop.

there are so many ways that buying link or selling links can get you busted, but here is the big thing EQUALITY you just don’t now who will take the bullet, from my experience it’s hit and miss..

Take link sellers like :
www.9rules.com
www.9rules.com
www.nwsource.com
www.nwsource.com
www.infoplease.com
www.infoplease.com
www.phpclasses.org
www.phpclasses.org
www.howstuffworks.com
www.howstuffworks.com

They all seem to be holding their traffic, well most do

you might think I’m outing these guys, well that happened quite a few weeks ago when I had to do a site re-inclusion request, and yes if you have bought links or have bad links going to your site you better be able to prove what was bought and what was not and include them all in the reinclusion report. The difficult thing was that it was links that had been bought months before I was hired so even harder to trace back.

What was odd in my eyes was why didn’t these sites get the same treatment the client did .. he didn’t even rank for his own name ! We were lucky that we could find out what had happened and could fix it, with the help of Google and a lengthy report the site came back, but I see other industries that are still buying links and dominating the top slots.. so do we want to even up the playing field? Do we all log into our Google Webmaster consoles and start reporting. Buying links has never been so cheap and never been so risky…

DaveN

Nofollow sculpting my take

Have seen several cases now where using “nofollow” on internal links did this

a) Increased ranking on short tail and killed a lot of long tail traffic .. Hmmm not good
b) Didn’t effect ranking’s at all .. Ok so my internal page rank may have lifted a little here
c) Decreased rankings in general .. NOT COOL !
d) Slightly increased traffic over all. Way COOL !

Now the big issue for me is there are a few people that are starting to say this is the silver bullet for SEO, but what I don’t want to say is this is bullshit, there are too many other factors why you could have moved in the serps, the big clean up in the paid links could have and a side effect on your rankings or your competitors…

so the 6 million dollar question, does NOFOLLOWING your internals effect your Ranking in google, I say ranking and not Pagerank. Not even I’m going to say that No-Following all but 3 pages from your homepage won’t increase you pagerank on those internals, But I have seen some ODD STUFF happen so i decided the only real way to do this was

a) set up controlled tests. I so love doing that, but what happens if the test is influenced by external factors like say

howstuffworks.com links to sitea.com which links to me, then howstuffwork.com gets hit with a link selling penalty which in turn effects the link juice from sitea.com to me and I drop a little in the ranking… thats the way this link stuff works you know.

b) just ask Matt Cutts so I did.

Matt’s answer was :

Nofollowing your internals can affect your ranking in Google, but it’s a 2nd order effect.

My analogy is: suppose you’ve got $100. Would you rather work on getting $300, or would you spend your time planning how to spend your $100 more wisely.

Spending the $100 more wisely is a matter of good site architecture (and nofollowing/sculpting PageRank if you want). But most people would benefit more from looking at how to get to the $300 level.

_____________________________

sheesh a simple YES would have been ok, But I’m totally in agreeance with Matt here. Me I worry about getting to the next level of Pagerank and not loosing what little I have … so link to me.. joke i tend to house keep my site every so often to decide how many pages my site should have indexed, 301 the old crappy stuff in fact I’m hoping to do that before SES New York, i will tell you how that worked out.

DaveN

Addef this is a great article by joost on
PageRank sculpting - Siloing and more

AdSense and Bad Content

Is it still the same that if you mention

death, dead, deceased, demise, die, dying
expire, fatal stroke, past away, perished

or drug related terms like

cocaine, drugs, heroin, marjuana, medication, morphine, overdose

you can get you adsense Accounts Banned

DaveN

this post has this copyright notice :

Copyright Notice
All rights, including copyright, in the content of this web page are owned or controlled for these purposes by www.davidnaylor.co.uk

In accessing this web page, you agree that you may only download the content for your own personal non-commercial use. this means no advertising on this post at all

Alltop and Guy Kawasaki

ok Guy Kawasaki email me about his new site http://alltop.com/
quote from the email :

We recently released a website that is a collection of “single-page aggregations” organized by topics such as Fashion, Celebrities, Sports, Gaming, Macintosh, Science, Green, and Autos. Your feed is at this topic: http://SEO.alltop.com/
Here people can find SEO news from dozens of sites, side-by-side, at a glance. I hope that you will like it ….. blah blah

Ok I don’t know Guy, but friends speak highly of Him thats why he is getting blog space here…

Ok, First off I don’t like it I just don’t feel it brings my anything new, now if you could add a a couple of things I would like it,
the ability for me the user to customise my own page, so I can add feeds into a central point where alltop can then try and get a feel for what’s missing in my central feed, and by giving me new choices built up from what the other user feeds are :

say I have 3 car feeds , 4 seo feeds, 1 designer clothes feed pushed to my central user area, other users with similar matches could offer me “Omega Watch Feeds” or “Mobile phone feeds” or whatever rocks their boats. but the quality is maintain by alltop not just the user base.

Anyway I wish you luck.

DaveN

Insurance.com cease and desist

This is cool I used to have a vertical directory and just got a cease and desist from insurance.com, 2 things jump to mind, one there was no name on the email or telephone number, the return email address went to a non-specific domain not solicitors…

so is this a real C and D or someone trying to get links remove for insurance.com ??

_______________

Dear Sir/Madam

I am contacting you on behalf of Insurance.com, located in Cleveland, Ohio. We manage Insurance.com’s Internet monitoring function for brand identity issues on the Internet.

The following website ( removed ) uses the trademarked name of Insurance.com or one of its subsidiaries on its site.

As owner of the name, Insurance.com (and/or its subsidiaries) owns the exclusive right to reproduce and use its trademarks and authorize any reproduction and use. Insurance.com does not recognize the use of its name in the above-referenced site as authorized. Therefore, your use of this trademark is a violation of its rights.

Insurance.com demands that you cease and desist from using its name in any manner and that you remove all use of its trademark from the referenced website.

Please address these issues immediately. Please contact me with any questions.

Sincerely,

Trademark Administration
Insurance.com

Hackers and Spammers, How will the industry survive

I don’t think this is any secret, well I hope it isn’t, thats the 2 worlds are getting closer and closer. This year I have had suggestions like: (which I would like to state I haven’t done any of them):

a) Can you market this idea, we hack into a competitors server, then add a load of gateway pages, get some TLA links, and ping your competitor is gone.

b) We Hack your competitor, and add Robots.txt file to kill the site or No-follow every Internal link.

c) We can Hack site for Links, Edu are easy, Gov’s are more risky so I have to charge $25 dollars extra.

d) We can hack large PR site and put your competitor sites on them to cause dupe content issues.

e) We have large amounts of Data from XXXXXX search engine, users email and passwords.. any ideas what to do with it.

f) We have all the data from this website XXXXXX you want a copy.

g) We can get anything PR4 or below removed from Google within 3 weeks, example sites are …..

h) We can buy links on a network that will get the client banned.

i) Can you blog a month of link buys, where you out sites that are buying links. We will pay you £20,000 you have to mention site xxxxx.co.uk and here is the bought links report.

I remember having a chat with some Webmasters and some Googlers about if your purchased links to a competitors site could you get it banned, the Googlers obviously said why would you do that, you run the risk off helping them rank better, my argument has always been if you spend 10 million on PPC and just move 10 % into competitor disruption you will cost them a lot more if you can knock them from above you, yes you run the risk of making them rank better, but hey they rank better already..

Anyway I see this year has been the worst for Blackhat SEO we have ever seen, so the best Whitehat advice I can give at the moment is take an audit.

a) Who has access to the Site

b) Set up weekly checks, document changes, folder creation, user creation

c) Get your backlinks in order, set up webmaster style consoles with the search engines and archive off the data.

d) Start a record of events, on this date we employed SEO abc company, on this date we use Mr XXXXX for viral campaign

c) Check what’s happening in your industry and log that and form strategic partnerships with your competitors where you can.

e) Don’t trust anyone

DaveN

one.com
smx

Start with £50 credit in your new Yahoo! Search Marketing account for a limited period only.

+ Advertise Here