SEO is Dead: Check Out KP Baby
After browsing The Sun tabloid the other day I saw that Katie Price had launched a new babywear site. When I see new sites I like to have a delve into the source code and browse around the site to see what been missed out SEO-wise.
Well on kpbaby.co.uk it seems like SEO hasn’t even been thought of at all (possibly because of blindness brought about by all the pink!) Oh – actually maybe the title tag has chucked a nod in the right direction.
<title>Katie Price Babywear - Home of Katie Price baby wear, sleepsuits, blankets,bibs,hats,booties</title>
A “wish list” title tag looks pretty untidy when it shows up in the SERPS and it also has little effect on each keyword. Google only counts 84 characters and displays even less (67 characters) and this spills over at 95 characters. At least this title gets cuts off neatly at “sleepsuits” and not halfway through a word.
H Tags
It’s proper practice to only have one H1 tag, and break up the rest of a page with other heading – H2s and so on. Having three H1 tags is bit of an issue. I hear you cry: “well maybe they’re really good H1 tags”….
<h1>Our Products</h1> <h1>Shopping Basket</h1> <h1>Newsletter</h1>
The H2’s are slightly better, but not by much.
<h2> Welcome message from Katie</h2> <h2> Baby wear</h2> <h2>Accessories</h2> <h2>Gift Sets</h2>
URLs
Next up: classic homepage duplication. Both http://www.kpbaby.co.uk/ and http://www.kpbaby.co.uk/index.php load. The ‘index.php’ isn’t indexed yet so there aren’t going to be any dupe content issues straight away, but when you link the home button on the menu bar it takes you to the index.php version.
I can’t see it been long before this gets picked up. Placing a 301 re direct on the index.php to go to the non index.php, would solve the problem but make sure you change the home button link destination on the menu bar as well.
There’s no 404 error page, so putting test.php on the end of the URL will just take you to a white screen.
PR & Linking
Since the KP Baby site is new it has no PR yet so one of the easiest ways to give it PR would be linking to it from Katie’s other web properties. I can see the link on the KP Equestrian but that’s only a PR2. Both KP Equestrian & KP Baby Link to the official katieprice.co.uk which is a PR4 but there is no link coming from katieprice.co.uk to either of her e-commerce sites.
Since these are all in the same family cross linking would be fine and would give KP Baby an immediate boost.
Content
It’s commonly believed that the higher up your source code your content is the better impact it will have with Google, compared to it been at the bottom of your source code. The ‘content’ such as it is reads thus:
“Welcome to my first babywear collection. It’s been a long time coming, but I’m sooo pleased with it! Your new little princess is going to look even more gorgeous in KP Baby”
..and a couple of short sentences about some of the product ranges. This chunk of content is in the bottom 3rd of the source code so while not strictly at the bottom it’s hardly close to the top.
I guess for a site like this with a big name celebrity endorsement, publicity alone will drive traffic. But of course, celebrity rarely lasts. As Katie’s popularity inevitably wanes, a little sprinkling of SEO would help in keeping visitor numbers up for the long term – regardless of the Katie Price branding.
At least they have Google Analytics on so that they can see how much traffic they are getting





SEO Shredder - Dom Zimmerman 1097 days ago
Nice post- Just interested in how many times have you seen a new site lately with more than one H1 recently, is this fairly common?
Gareth 1097 days ago
http://www.seo-doctor.co.uk/Has Dave tidied up his meta title for this post?! The meta title was always not being fully displayed for this blog.
Chris 1097 days ago
And what a horrible site, looks like your typical shop in a box crap
Reed Holmes 1097 days ago
How do you know Google only reads the first 95 characters in the title tag? Is it possible Google only displays the first 95 characters but takes into account all words in the title tag in it’s search results?
Jignesh 1097 days ago
Hi,
i can not understand the title and article relation, you explained about that website and seo point but i did not find any justification of your title “SEO is dead” in this article.
rory 1097 days ago
@ Reed: Characters in the title tag has been tested over and over.
discuit 1097 days ago
http://www.twitter.com/discuitseeing as Katie Price has been around for the past 15 years, i can’t see the tabloids getting sick of her. Ever. Well until the OK Funeral special.
Tim Shapcott 1097 days ago
Everybody is missing the point – this is just another post to drive traffic to a blog using currently popular search terms …
Jignesh 1097 days ago
http://www.eltalearning.com@Tim very true…its seems that this article is only written for driving traffic (link baiting – controversial writing)…
DaveN 1097 days ago
@tim I guess you write content for other reasons like … hmm their isn’t any in my world
Adam Heaton 1097 days ago
http://blog.weblinx.biz/As soon as I saw the header I was horrified by all the grainy graphics, that website will lose visitors whether it has SEO or not!
shaun 1096 days ago
http://www.shaunparker.infojust back from honeymoon and read this…. the post title says SEO is dead!! makes me think there is more than just ‘headline attraction’ behind that statement Dave??
Would be interested to know if there is a subliminal message Mr N – I have my own thoughts on the industry at present.
Rampage 1096 days ago
http://www.searchengineoptimisation.orgThe site looks awful, imo. Perhaps Harvey had a hand in designing it…
Gareth 1095 days ago
Add “unfriendly” URLS and lack of alt tags to the list
RaAmage 1095 days ago
http://www.searchengineoptimisation.orgwhy are you making up the 87 character rule from? this is 2010, not 1990. jumping on the banwagon of a celebrity just to boost your own website…cheap.
Rampage 1094 days ago
http://www.searchengineoptimisation.orgWhy are you are trying to steal my username and url to pretend to be me?
SEO Title Tags - How many characters of an html title tag can Google index? 164 or more according to this test | hugoguzman.com 1094 days ago
[...] Friday night, a blog post by Rory Lofthouse over at Dave Naylor’s blog prompted me to run a scientific experiment of sorts, which focused on just how many characters of [...]
terry Van Horne 1094 days ago
http://www.internationalwebsitebuilders.comReally like to know what the title indexation statement is based on… When the title seldom truncates mid word one could assume a char length function is done w/truncate at closet space is used which would account for no one figuring out a truncation mark. As to indexing you’re wrong period. Google indexes a lot more than that whether it is weighted as title or a match or weighted match is what is debatable.
JC 1093 days ago
http://www.twitter.com/brabs666Hi Rory, interesting article!
Out of interest on the index.php bit, what method do you prefer to avoid this issue?
1. using on the index.php page OR
2. some kind of .htaccess redirect ?
rory 1093 days ago
Hi JC
I would use an .htaccess redirect
Hope this is of some help
Jack 1090 days ago
http://www.metayer.deThey will never lern to make it right…”why should we have 404s?” we do not need an error page
Gareth 1089 days ago
http://www.seo-doctor.co.uk/I noticed- checking your original statement – the test.php actually works and the katieprice website is a members only website so you can’t knwo what back links there are (unless you are a member!?!)
lame way of getting people to your blog by ‘dis-ing’ a celeb
Rampage 1088 days ago
http://www.searchengineoptimisation.orgHow can you call yourself an “seo consultant” but then make a statement saying that a site being a members only one prevents you seeing what backlinks it has?
Rampage 1086 days ago
http://www.searchengineoptimisation.orgthere is a lot of traffic being referred to kpbaby from katieprice – so there are backlinks. traffic is about 2500 visits a day