Rumours: Forbes Given Final warning
Rumours are that Forbes have been warned to stop selling links that are trying to influence the search engine results downside is if they have a 12 months contract to supply in that format it could get a little messy LOl.
And the question I would ask is why do 90% of Forbes Ads go via the Forbes ad system and one company get straight links, if I was advertising on Forbes I wouldn’t be happy 
DaveN
Dudibob 1754 days ago
http://www.dudibob.comwarned by who!? Google? what happens if they don’t co-operate?
Jojo 1754 days ago
http://www.internetmarketing-news.de/So, what could happen? Will Google penalize the buyer or the seller? Or only take away the link juice?
Jeremy Luebke 1754 days ago
So I guess the new technique Cutts was talking about was straight up one on one threats to link sellers. Simple and effective, NOT
Markus Jalmerot 1754 days ago
http://www.getupdated.co.ukI strongly doubt that google contact newspapers in this matter, but what do I know, LOL. Should be interesting to see what happens with links futhermore..
Halfdeck 1753 days ago
http://www.seo4fun.com/blog/Since algorithms don’t give out warnings, I guess that means Google doesn’t penalize paid links algorithmically. So if you’re a small time link seller, you got nothing to worry about – Google will work its way top-down.
Nick Wilsdon 1737 days ago
http://www.e3internet.com>So if you’re a small time link seller, you got nothing to worry about – Google will work its way top-down.
Hmm not sure about that one Halfdeck. Advertising budgets talk in this business, the ‘little guy’ often get more shafted by these kind of changes than the big corp. Also the big corps get the benefit of a rep to advise them on compliance. *cough* BMW *cough*