“REDFLY Mobile Companion” and Google scandal

The guardian reported a scandalous thing that Google was doing..

JackSchofield said :

Well, is there anything wrong with that? Not really, but I can be picky. First, the suggestion that the top story (Gizmodo) was found 51 minutes ago is impressive but not necessarily true. I did the same search two hours later and Google found the same story, but said it was found “13 minutes ago”. OK, maybe it’s a different Google index, but the times vary so it might as well be a random number.


wow, but wait a minute You screen shot the first one at 51 minutes, but didn’t both to screen shot the one that validates the story then JackSchofield said :

As for the claim that Google “found” about 16 million results in 0.11 seconds, or whatever, I’m sure that impressed us for a while. But when it’s obviously not true, guys, and you know it’s not true, that just undermines your credibility…..

But Jack google says “Results 1 - 10 of about 287,000,000 for keyword. (0.12 seconds)” it’s you that’s Implying that google had a quick peak at millions of pages and returned the 10 most relevant ones in 0.12 seconds

and then in the comments

Well, yes, I know that. The point I’m making is that Google is reporting numbers in ways that don’t mean anything to — or are misleading — ordinary users.


Hey Jack I don’t think ordinary users actually look at those numbers, and on the time found and you have backed this up, I can’t replicate you test/errror.

DaveN

read the whole story here http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/01/02/isnt_google_wonderful.html

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Mixx

7 Comments | Leave a comment »

  1. 1. Jamie Carruthers | January 3rd 2008 @ 6:50 pm

    Minor point Dave, but you say the Torygraph reported it, but the report is on the Guardian.

  2. 2. DaveN | January 3rd 2008 @ 7:08 pm

    oops .. guardian your right ;)

  3. 3. MelC | January 3rd 2008 @ 7:27 pm

    What bugs me is when I read journos saying “there are 51 million websites all about paris hilton” because of those numbers - no there aren’t! At least he didn’t use the word “hits” in his article :-)

  4. 4. 賃貸 大阪 | January 4th 2008 @ 1:56 am

    Goog job to call them out on that. I know it was on a blog but the Guardian should be more careful.

  5. 5. g1smd | January 4th 2008 @ 6:44 pm

    Too many journos seem to follow this rule:

    “”Never let the facts get in the way of a good story.”"

  6. 6. Anonymous | January 4th 2008 @ 8:39 pm

    Dave, what does this have to do with the REDFLY?

  7. […] Word of SEM Experts’ (blogs) I Admire Dave Naylor (Daven) says “We all know Google doesn’t know how to count” and he’s right, Debra Mastaler wants Google to use its official communication […]

Leave a Reply

required

required, hidden

+ Advertise Here