Check google out site:searchenginewatch.com

checkout : webmastercentral

DaveN

hat tip to jenstar

DaveN

11 Comments

  • 1

    Wasn’t me :)

    I think Elisabeth was going out to get a new Google helmet, and she might have slipped before making the purchase.

    Danny Sullivan | http://searchengineland.com

    1st March 2007 @ 21:30

  • 2

    I am sure it has nothing to do with the 301 to searchengineland danny put in before he left ;)

    ShoeMoney | http://www.shoemoney.com

    1st March 2007 @ 21:46

  • 3

    “If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.”

    Then you get about 93 000 results!

    Mike Empuria | http://www.empuriabravaonline.com

    1st March 2007 @ 22:05

  • 4

    136,000 pages in Supplemental Results

    site:searchenginewatch.com *** -view

    Ryan McDonnell | http://www.ryanmcdonnell.com/

    1st March 2007 @ 22:15

  • 5

    Another site: bug/feature. Clicking “repeat the search with…” the number bounds up to 92,500 results. Been seeing this on a bunch of sites lately.

    JLH | http://www.jlh-design.com

    1st March 2007 @ 22:30

  • 6

    Only one page? I’ve noticed this in lots of sites last two weeks, you browse the index and only get a little % of the pages, but it doesn’t even say that all of the “not shown” are Supplemental, in fact .. plenty of them are valuable and high ranking pages.

    Google’s fault xD

    Edd

    1st March 2007 @ 23:20

  • 7

    what’s with all the JS in the top of the file?

    graywolf | http://www.wolf-howl.com

    1st March 2007 @ 23:38

  • Ryan McDonnell | http://www.ryanmcdonnell.com

    3rd March 2007 @ 08:45

  • 9

    Yep, Ryan – that google post outlines the cause of it.

    haha Danny…. besides, before he could pull the 301 trick, I blocked all of his priviledges before he left;)

    note in my post on the issue – SEW is far from dead since the departure of Danny/Chris… In fact, since Jan1 – we’ve actually seen a bit of improvement in daily traffic. I think i may make a danny-esque post on it:)

    Elisabeth Osmeloski | http://searchenginewatch.com

    4th March 2007 @ 01:02

  • 10

    Hmm odd

    Esrun | http://www.onlinehoster.com/blog

    4th March 2007 @ 20:43

  • 11

    That definitely is strange… I’ve never seen such a difference between the displayed and omitted results.

    Brian Laks | http://www.brianlaks.com/

    5th March 2007 @ 06:20

Write a Comment

*

*

*

SES New YorkA4U Expo Munich
Subscribe
to the David Naylor feed
Follow
David Naylor's Twitter feed

View Dave's Blog