Matt Cutts said on his blog :
Q: Is the update winding down?
A: It’s starting to. Recall that all of Jagger1/2/3 are separate changes. Jagger1 and 2 are done, and you can see what Jagger3 will look like at 66.102.9.104.
well Dam the site I lost didn’t come back …. but at least we know why ![]()
try search for mattcutts
now try mattcutts.com
you see it can happen to anyone .. if they’re not careful or leave the backdoor open .. ![]()
Matt you want to explain why this occured ![]()
screenshots : matt cutts no more
matt cutts in the serps
DaveN
12 Comments
-
1
10th November 2005 @ 13:04
-
2
Intellesting.
10th November 2005 @ 15:06
-
3
No - He doesn’t
10th November 2005 @ 17:07
-
4
Vely Intellesting, maybe it’s a *callolic issue*
10th November 2005 @ 18:14
-
5
Hate when that happens
10th November 2005 @ 18:35
-
6
Eh. It’s been like that for a while (before Jagger?). I’ve been too busy to ask, but thanks to your mocking japes I’ll actually ask someone about it.
10th November 2005 @ 21:16
-
7
Certainly seen a few sites that appear to be incompletely represented in the index - ie, cache is 4 months old, major internal pages not showing for themselves, etc.
10th November 2005 @ 23:05
-
8
It’s finally good see someone from Google get caught up in their own algorithm.
11th November 2005 @ 22:04
-
9
Just goes to show the Google Algo has no favourites.
14th November 2005 @ 23:09
-
10
Anymore on this ? - Matt seems to have side stepped the issue nicely

No more at Threadwatch either.15th November 2005 @ 17:20
-
11
Any updates on this one?
24th November 2005 @ 16:30
-
12
Matt would literally be understanding jagger updates now. what a finding ha h ahh hahaaaa
14th June 2006 @ 06:28



he he