Interflora – Where have all the flowers gone?
If you work in the search marketing sector it’s been hard to miss the penalty that has been dumped on Interflora this week. Is was first noticed on Tuesday but it wasn’t until SearchMetrics was updated today that the true picture of the penalty starts to take shape when you see such a dramatic fall from grace.
This is plain to see that it’s a manual penalty, often sometimes the hardest to recover from, but we will have to see what happens over the next few days and weeks. Some of you may remember when BMW got penalised back in 2006 but it didn’t take long for Google to realise that actually their “customers” needed and expected to see BMW in the results, especially when they searched for “bmw”. Within the search marketing industry we have to constantly remind ourselves that the general population doesn’t understand what makes sites appear at the top, nor do they care as long as they can find what they are looking for. Some people won’t even realise that Interflora isn’t ranking for their brand organically with the huge spread of PPC ads. (its getting harder to differentiate paid from organic these days)
Interflora not ranking for their brand name is an issue for us, but for Google’s customers they are likely to just click on the PPC ads. What hurts brands more is when you lose rankings for major search terms.
Interflora are still ranking number one for a whole host of keywords
But what they are missing are the prime keywords that we know would be driving the most organic traffic…this is some of the rankings from last week
and this are some from today
This is when you can identify that manual intervention at Google is in play as specific keywords have been targeted and these are likely to have been overcooked in the link profile, with links that Google aren’t happy with. I’m not going to start getting into a big link analysis here as every SEO out there will have been digging around and have their own opinion of what is right or wrong, what Google is classing as “unnatural” but there could be a whole host of issues that we are not aware of going on, so until more information is available we can but speculate. There are also pages on the site that Google would not be happy with too that can’t be overlooked.
But What To Do Now?
What do you do when you get penalised like this? You’re a big brand, and have invested in your web presence for years, enjoyed the masses of traffic that ranking for major terms have brought, grown with the rankings in terms of staffing … and then one morning you wake up and the traffic has gone. (well the relatively cheap organic traffic has gone, compared to the cost of PPC traffic on major keywords)
As all companies should have, that rely on Google for their revenue, you should always have a domain name tucked away in reserve that you can pull out of the bag and relaunch on. So will we be seeing a new domain popping up somewhere, maybe an uk.interflora.co.uk or interfloraflowers.co.uk, as it’s been seen in quite a few sectors where a site will rebrand to a new domain.. But, on the flipside, if it’s on page issues a full site analysis would certainly pick out areas that Google would not see as desirable in this era where they are clamping down on weak or spammy pages that are there purely to boost rankings.
If this isn’t an option and you have burnt the domain, you have a few choices. Depending how close you are to Google, or how big your brand is, this is a starting point to get in touch with a Google rep to try to gauge how bad it’s looking for the domain. The other option would be the clean up and reinclusion request but this could take a very long time especially with link penalties, as depending on what links have been built and how, it can be a very hard task and then you are left with not enough links passing equity to rank anyway so you’re back at square one even if the penalty is removed. They could maybe also launch a partnership with a strong domain in a separate sector on a sub domain of their site, such as interflora.hallmark.co.uk to regain some of the lost traffic and regain brand rankings
It will be interesting to see what develops from this as the dust settles and the storm passes to the next big thing that Google throw at the SEO industry, and will Google now be looking at the flower industry as a whole or looking to see who is left ranking for the Interflora keyword to see how they themselves have achieved their rankings?











IrishWonder 87 days ago
http://www.irishwonder.com/blogTheir kneejerk reaction link removal campaign is certainly not helping – not the right links to remove… and yes with their stash of 5,000+ domains you’d think they do have options for relaunch
Mad Mike 87 days ago
They now appear to have dropped off the face of the earth for all the terms you’d picked out as still ranking 1st.
You’ve pretty much nailed the approach I’d take already; they should work to recover the penalised domain while developing the presence of a secondary domain at the same time, hedge their bets incase a recovery doesn’t happen as soon as desired (like next week) and have a plan B for the next time they get caught out.
Interflora - Banned for Exact Match Links | Paul Martin SEO 87 days ago
[...] it’s been pointed out on every SEO blog going, Interflora got smacked with a penalty by Google on the 20th February [...]
Andy Symonds 87 days ago
http://thebloghouse.com/Great breakdown of what has happened and the options open to them David. It will be interesting to see which path they choose…
Craig 87 days ago
http://www.fusionunlimited.co.ukThat Searchmetrics graph is the stuff of nightmares!
Looks like they’ve had a penalty before which they’ve recovered from. If they’ve gone through a reconsideration request and promised to abide by guidelines and have now been hit again, I imagine that they’ve gone down the same link building routes and the branded penalty is punishment for that. If so, this penalty could be much more difficult to recover from.
Bronson 87 days ago
http://www.bronsonharrington.com/Yeah Dave, big trouble – just noticed this development this morning and it’s sparked quite a discussion amongst our seo team.
Based on your great review and article about this it looks like it’s going to be more of a PR exercise / relationship building one with big G to get back on track than what a simple seo cleanup could achieve. Manual penalties are a proverbial byatch!
Mike Charalambous 86 days ago
http://www.michaelcharalambous.com/Interesting that you think it’s worth relaunching on a new domain. I run roulette.co.uk, and there’s no way we’d consider moving to another domain.
It simply wouldn’t be fair… it’s not just the “domain” that matters; it’s the relevance, the clickability of it, the recognition, the brand, the trust. Everythign that comes with clicking a result when looking at it in the serps, or seeing it in your address bar.
Ebrar 86 days ago
Hello David ,
I monitor all these florists websites and believe me or not Interflora and Serenata buy paid links all the time , and over-optimise on-page all the time , look at the title tag of this URL : http://www.serenataflowers.com/sendflowers/london. htm for instance.
Anonymous 86 days ago
Just general fact checking and wondering where you got the idea they were ranking #1 for some keywords.
After doing my own rank check I came up with these figures.
corsage flowers – 48
sending flowers uk – 44
florist in london – 41
fruit hampers – 66
Did you actually check yourself or just trust search metics..
Google Says No Comment On Why Interflora Was Penalized 86 days ago
[...] Naylor shows approximately how much traffic they lost because of the Google penalty, and it is not [...]
Murray 86 days ago
Bigger brands usually get off a lot easier (jcpenney), they will probably talk to someone at google, clean up a little bit and bounce back soon enough
Fionn Downhill 83 days ago
http://www.elixirinteractive.comMurray I agree with you Sadly, its the Mom and Pops who finally made enough money to hire an SEO who did rotten links and burned their business last year who may never come back. Some small business did the linking themselves following guidelines from SEO companies putting out bad advice simply to make a name for themselves. I know one thing anybody who can truly get organic SEO results following Google’s guidelines and are not working on big name brands should be paid a lot of money.
Trucoseo 85 days ago
http://www.trucoseo.comI guess is too duplicate content.
There are two subdomains that have duplicate content
http://www-lon.interflora.co.uk/
http://www-uol.interflora.co.uk/category/valentines/
Look at my article in Spanish http://trucoseo.com/la-brusca-caida-seo-interflora-co-uk/
Chris 85 days ago
http://www.onedirection.netThis is an interesting one, however the sceptic inside me thinks that the “big brand effect” will bring Interflora’s rankings swiftly returning. They would never in a million years relaunch on a new domain, and I think quite simply by the very fact that people are talking about this all over the blogs and the Twittosphere, the term “Interflora” will be a lot more visible over the coming days and weeks.
Any obviously naughty links cleaned up coupled with the fact that there’s more discussion on “interflora” seen by the spiders and the social visibility will sort things out.
But its certainly an interesting observation. I run a very busy website about the boyband One Direction, which ranks on page 1 of Google.com for “one direction”, but doesn’t even rank in the top 100 in Google.co.uk for the same term. The domain name is http://www.onedirection.net and we have a UK based server, but for some reason we seem to be penalised in the UK. We’ve spent the last 6 months investigating and have never built any dodgy links – more relying on pure content quality and consistency. It’s a mystery to us, and something which is very annoying.
It seems that simply providing obviously great content and being a worthwhile destination for search traffic isn’t enough.
Good luck to Interflora but I expect their return will be a lot quicker than lesser brands and much smaller websites.
Chris.
Michael Schramm 72 days ago
http://tuxsc.comI just checked interflora.co.uk with Searchmetrics again and SEO Visibility is back at 11.119 as of today.
On 2013-02-28 it was at 152.
What happened?