Google “site:” operator broken

06.10.06

Rumours are afoot around the search world that Google’s site:, link: and other operators are soon to be moved into the Webmaster Tools section.

We all know about link: so some prime examples of site: broken are:

Domain Claimed pages Special info TBPR
www.zippy.co.uk 728 PR0
www.zecco.com 125 dupcon filt PR0
www.shawnhogan.com 711 PR0
www.1000misspenthours.com 850 PR5
www.101registerme.com 314 PR5
www.123rul.dk 696 PR0
www.webstartplace.biz 385 PR0
www.alierra.com 100 PR5
www.sea-doo.com 137 Corp. site PR6
www.ostomy-winnipeg.ca 389 PR4
www.mumbaiflorist.com 679 PR6
www.thebookofdays.com 337 1sup PR5
www.shadedrelief.com 95 PR6
www.avansis.ch 184 PR4

As you can see, Google claims to have indexed many pages from these sites, yet only shows results 1 - 3. Some of these domains are spammy, some are good-boy Corps, some are new, some are old, some have PR, some don’t, etc. We’re not 100% finalised on why these domains are experiencing this yet.

14 Comments

  • 1

    Is it just me, or is it only google.co.uk that’s showing results 1-3? I can see all results for the above in google.com

    robbie

    6th October 2006 @ 14:47

  • 2

    Yes, my blog is with the same problem!

    site:josefernandes.pt

    Regards,
    Jose Fernandes

    Jose Fernandes
    http://josefernandes.pt

    6th October 2006 @ 15:49

  • 3

    Site operator is seriously broken. Site:davidnaylor.co.uk shows the first few results as non supplemental but the rest are supps. This applies to a LOT of sites right now. First few results ok, but then supps only.

    himitsu

    6th October 2006 @ 15:55

  • 4

    We have several unique catalog sites, which are all heavily seasoned, youngest is three years old, and we are experiencing the same supplemental results, prior to Tuesday we were authorities in our space. We also just launched a new server with several sites on it and it is only showing first three results for a search. Looks like they really broke it this time, or was that their intent?

    Best Regards

    J-Man

    6th October 2006 @ 19:02

  • 5

    It had already been broken for more than a week.

    There were sporadic reports of this more than two weeks ago. At first it was only on a few of their 44 datacentres but it gradually spread to almost all of them by a few nights ago.

    Most sites only showed 3 results in total, or showed 3 normal results, followed by some supplemental results, for a site total that was often less than 10% of the real number of pages.

    The supplemental results often had a date only a few weeks old, whereas the “correct” results had mainly being showing a cache date from 6 months ago. Most sites returned almost nothing from the normal index.

    This morning it looks like the problem has been fixed again.

    Was this an import of data to the servers that went seriously wrong, or was it that data meant for the normal index just went missing, or was the data really there and it was just a bug in pulling that data from the database to populate the search results?

    I’ll guess we’ll never know….

    g1smd

    7th October 2006 @ 21:43

  • 6

    They were pushing a new binary; the site: command is showing plenty of results for me now.

    Matt Cutts
    http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/

    8th October 2006 @ 02:09

  • 7

    I’ve recently seen a site with zero site: results but still has pages that return cache: results. any idea what’s going on there?

    Craig

    9th October 2006 @ 16:58

  • 8

    Craig TBH I would need to see the site.

    DaveN

    admin

    9th October 2006 @ 17:02

  • 9

    Will it ever stop? Google used to be predictable and stable. Oh boy, do I long for those days.. Oh well. I guess that is just another “feature” to add to the list.

    Bjorn Solstad
    http://www.devenia.com/

    10th October 2006 @ 01:05

  • 10

    Congrats on your Matt Cutt’s link!

    JLH
    http://www.hvac-direct.com

    11th October 2006 @ 16:14

  • 11

    Good work David - glad you helped to raise awareness with Matt on this one.

    Whitey
    http://www.cheaperthanhotels.co.uk

    13th October 2006 @ 02:15

  • 12

    Anybody saw that the supplemental index operator not working any more?
    ( site:domain.com ***)

    B-Scan
    http://www.seofruits.com.hr/

    13th October 2006 @ 08:17

  • 13

    If all of your pages are supposed to be listed as www then this search:

    site:domain.com -inurl:www

    will still show you all of your www Supplemental Results.

    You might need to add &filter=0 to the search URL to get the full picture.

    g1smd

    14th October 2006 @ 15:15

  • 14

    Links to this page from other sites were originally indexed as http://www.davidnaylor.co.uk/archives/2006/10/06/google-site-operator-broken/ but that URL now returns a 404 error.

    There is no 301 redirect to get you to the new URL here at: http://www.davidnaylor.co.uk/google-site-operator-broken.html

    Likewise for the rest of the old “archive” URLs.

    g1smd

    2nd November 2007 @ 00:09

Add a Comment

*

*

*

Come and work with David Naylor and the team Subscribe
to the David Naylor feed
Follow
David Naylor's Twitter feed
View Dave's Blog