Google 301 and Seomoz

Whilst in Seattle, Rand and Me where playing SEO experts and we ran across Seomoz.com being index by Google which is a 301 redirect to seomoz.org, we quickly discussed the recent server move .. blah blah and I had reckoned by the time I got home it would have gone but things are worse ..

There was 2 pages indexed before now Google site: today 45 pages !! and instead of ranking for a long tail query we found in the logs it ranks for :

seomoz

DaveN

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Reddit
  • Technorati

16 Comments | Leave a comment »

  1. 1. Dave Dugdale | November 13th 2007 @ 3:16 pm

    “Playing SEO experts”?

    Is that like, I am not a real SEO, I just play one on TV? :)

  2. 2. DaveN | November 13th 2007 @ 3:26 pm

    kinda :)

  3. 3. Walter Wimberly | November 13th 2007 @ 5:01 pm

    I think it is more like: With things like this going on - how can we ever determine we are actually to do?!

  4. 4. JLH | November 13th 2007 @ 5:55 pm

    All of the dot com pages shown under the site: command show a cache date of November 6th. Not sure if that’s relevant but it points to a single day when something may have gone whacky, either on Google’s side or SEOmoz’s redirect.

  5. 5. Jeremy Luebke | November 13th 2007 @ 8:11 pm

    I’m showing 52 pages with 3 different cache dates. Nov 6 on all but 2 pages. Another page with Nov 12 and the homepage with a cache of Nov 13.

    If the mozplex isn’t playing around with cloaking, it’s a definite bug with Google.

  6. 6. Igor The Troll | November 13th 2007 @ 8:50 pm

    I would disallow the dot com before shit hits the fan, and he’ll get a duplication penalty. Getting gready to pass the PR from dot com to dot org is not to smart…

  7. 7. inkode | November 13th 2007 @ 11:41 pm

    How long ago was this 301 implemented?

  8. 8. randfish | November 14th 2007 @ 12:40 am

    From talking to Jeff and Mel, there were a few hours 2 weeks ago when the redirect did not function, but we literally had them back up and running within 4-5 hours… We’re definitely not cloaking - this one’s on Google :)

  9. 9. Igor The Troll | November 14th 2007 @ 5:45 am

    Rand next time redirect them all to DaveN…:)

  10. 10. DaveN | November 14th 2007 @ 9:58 am

    It’s odd that google is now inside and running so to speak.. even thou the 301 is back in place..

    DaveN

  11. 11. Rob | November 14th 2007 @ 1:14 pm

    That’s an interesting one. If it’s all due to 4-5 hour error a few weeks ago, it shows just how quick Google are at picking up changes nowadays. Perhaps too quick in some cases.

  12. 12. Joost de Valk | November 15th 2007 @ 2:54 pm

    Could very well be though, they take like up to 60 days to actually pick up on a 301 redirect…

  13. 13. Forrest | November 16th 2007 @ 9:48 am

    Considering how many search conferences are right here in my home city … probably Microsoft being nearby has something to do with that … I really should check one out.

  14. 14. g1smd | November 22nd 2007 @ 5:40 pm

    It will take a few months for those other URLs to drop out of the SERPs.

    They are probably already marked up as being Supplemental anyway.

  15. 15. SEM guy Perth | November 28th 2007 @ 6:26 pm

    Hmmm, 301 redirects just leave me cold - don’t like em, don’t use em.

  16. 16. Rishil | December 6th 2007 @ 6:41 pm

    very odd… its still showing about 6 results AND “This is G o o g l e’s cache of http://www.seomoz.com/ugc as retrieved on 2 Dec 2007 04:56:29 GMT.”

Leave a Reply

required

required, hidden

Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Tags