Since Google said they where adding new features to Google Local to stop the spam I thought I would keep an eye out, normally I am banner blind to maps these days..

But how the hell do you get Covent Garden’s Hidden Village shopping centre, Adidas (Twice) and a Pay as you go car hire company !! some help me understand..

Google Local gets cleaners in london mixed up

Google Local gets cleaners in london mixed up

Dave

DaveN

10 Comments

  • 1

    Maybe someone has been deliberately mucking about?!? If you click on the result, the HTML contains the hitbox code:

    var strUrl = “http://maps.google.co.uk/maps/place?cid=12715116471710724715&q=cleaners+london&gl=uk&cad=src:ppreviews&ei=AQb4SuWaPJfKjAem-YE0&dtab=2&pcsi=12715116471710724715,0&geocode=FaYJEgMdhgz-_w”;
    //0 – No tracking, 1 – TestAccount, 2 – Production.
    var numHitBoxTrack = 2;

    Perhaps if you make a site appear often enough in google local and click through enough times, google sees ‘cleaners london’ in the HTML of the referrer.
    That sounds a bit rubbish as a theory, I’ll give you…

    malcolm coles | http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk

    9th November 2009 @ 12:12

  • 2

    That was the Adidas one by the way …

    malcolm coles | http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk

    9th November 2009 @ 12:15

  • 3

    I think it was based on the semantic markup languacge offered by thir party reffering pingbacks via the propsed anchor text developed on the hCard format of the geolocational factor.

    rishil | http://designer-watches.org

    9th November 2009 @ 12:15

  • 4

    Actually jokes apart, this>>>>>> http://twitter.com/patrickaltoft/statuses/5557076124

    rishil | http://designer-watches.org

    9th November 2009 @ 12:18

  • 5

    Except Google wouldn’t be surfing through its own search results. Doh. So what @rishil said.

    malcolm coles | http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk

    9th November 2009 @ 12:24

  • 6

    Maybe it’s because they’re cleaning up?

    Jokes aside, perhaps the maps system is a lot cruder than the main search function and is including Adidas because they’re popular for ‘London’? Weird how it is only them in that case though

    Dudibob

    9th November 2009 @ 13:26

  • 7

    why are google been such a arse nugget about this

    arse

    9th November 2009 @ 13:33

  • 8

    arse don’t be a arsehat :)

    DaveN

    9th November 2009 @ 14:14

  • 9

    Yeah arse, you arsehat, spamming sucks!! Loft Conversions London is just as bad.

    George

    9th November 2009 @ 16:11

  • 10

    Dave

    You don’t really like Google localisation do you ;-)
    First Google.co.uk results and now this,
    but most of the points you make are valid and hopefully Google will listen.

    Gul | http://www.ngt.co.uk

    18th November 2009 @ 11:17

Write a Comment

*

*

*

Hear me speak at SES London 2010 Subscribe
to the David Naylor feed
Follow
David Naylor's Twitter feed

View Dave's Blog