Brian Souter – Why Is His Site Removed From Google?
There was an article on the BBC News website today about Brian Souter, owner of Stagecoach, it turns out his site just disappeared from Google last month with no apparent reason. He’s lobbying government to get them to sort Google out, apparently he’s talked to Google and they said it was something to do with algorithm changes.
Has Brian Upset The Wrong People?
So, we decided to take it upon ourselves to have a look at his website. First up, you’ll notice, his entire site has been indexed through a web proxy: http://www.briansouter.com.14feb-youth.com/, funnily enough these guys seem to be something to do with the Arab Spring protests in Bahrain http://www.14feb-youth.com/. Whether it is intentional or not, I don’t know. But what I do know is Brian (or someone with the same name, or pretending to be Brian) has managed to piss off a lot of people – so maybe this is some kind of backlash? I’m not sure whether this is the same Brian Souter or not, but someone with the same name has been arguing against the Libya rebels, which may have upset the wrong people.
The SEO Bit
Well for starters his whole site is duplicated and indexed by Google – so first thing is first, he needs to get that sorted – probably the canonical tag would go some way to helping this, but also something that redirects you if you aren’t on the correct hostname.
Secondly his 404 errors are returning a 200 status code – which will also be causing problems.
His link profile looks ok – all of his links appear to be legit.
There is also more duplicate contentbeing cause by him using the same snippets of text to promote himself elsewhere, also his news articles – which must get posted by his PR agency first, are also no doubt being flagged as duplicate content.
But to Brian’s credit, we can’t see anything glaringly wrong with his site to prevent him being included in Google – although he has got a terrible reputational problem if you type his name into Google.





Mark S 616 days ago
You’re right about those things, but did you look at his HTML? Irrelevant h1/h2 tags and practically everything is marked up as div’s which offers no context to the bot’s.
An index page should be relevant, fresh and a bit wordy, and then have good internal linking from there.
Nick Hurst 616 days ago
http://www.nick-hurst.comI read this story on the beeb this morning and I wondered “What makes this guy think he is different to anyone else who gets penalised on Google?” and I can’t really see what they will do to “Sort Google out”, sometimes getting blacklisted is unexplained but I think your points above are contributing factors at the very least. Cheers.
Anthony Shapley 616 days ago
http://www.anthonyshapley.co.ukTo be honest, I think this is bad on Google’s part Nick, this is the mans personal website, it should rank for his name. If I wanted go to Brian Souter’s website, this is a shit user experience. I mean, get this, even BING managed to get it right: http://www.bing.com/search?q=brian+souter&go=&qs=n&sk=&sc=1-12&form=QBLH&filt=all
Daniel 616 days ago
His site is in the Google results… just not near the top. So all the talk of censorship is wrong. As to why his page ranks below even this one… perhaps people find his page less interesting than this
David Whitehouse 616 days ago
Daniel, can you send us a link please? He’s in Google when you type site:www.briansouter.com but if you search for content off of his site, you don’t get anything and if you search for his name, again you don’t get anything – it should be number 1.
John Callaghan 615 days ago
http://twitter.com/upliftmediaDuplicate content and other minor issues might have caused the site to become victim of a panda update?
On a related note, this quote from said BBC article infuriates me greatly:
“It’s not Google’s place to decide which sites we can see and those we can’t,” said Sir Brian in a statement.
Daniel 615 days ago
Sorry David, I don’t see why his personally created page should be the number 1 result. I can see why he would like it to be, but not any reason on earth why it necessarily should be the no. 1 result returned by Google. In fact, the first result is his Wikipedia page – a very sensible result, and which does indeed link to his personal page. So where is the censorship? This is a giant non-story pushed by a noisy individual who doesn’t care about bad publicity as long as he gets publicity (and more hits for his web site)
Basically, I don’t think nearly as many people post blogs or articles online that link to his personal page as post things that link to the many many many news stories the publicity seeking Sir Brian has generated through his business practices and choices of campaigns to fund and support.
You can see where I found Brian’s page here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dlivingstone/6146566481/ – the second hit on page 11 of the Google results.
(But I do note that a search for Brian Souter now returns this page on the first page of results – presumably this site has a higher reputation than Brian’s own…)
Anthony Baxter 615 days ago
I’m not seeing http://www.briansouter.com in 11th either under a ‘brian souter’ search, I am seeing Bronco in 8th POS though LOL
Daniel 615 days ago
Anthony, that search was conducted yesterday. The results change over time.
shendeng 610 days ago
http://www.cheap-juicy-bracelet.comTo be honest, I think this is bad on Google’s part Nick, this is the mans personal website, it should rank for his name.
Mark S 610 days ago
@Shendeng – The original version of his website was an irrelevant mess in SEO terms. It’s a question of creating semantic markup and having meaningful and relevant data in the priority tags, such as the H1 (which now contains “Sir Brian Souter”) on the homepage. The site was rebuilt sensibly and he is on the first page of results now.
It’s not up to Google to mess up their algorithms for edge cases like this where the guy did have a useless site and a lot of publicity on other better ranked sites.
SEO isn’t hard to learn, it’s just a question of a bit of organisation. I have a site that is the top two results for a combination of two common household words. A little bit of care and effort really does pay off.
Panda 606 days ago
http://sitespanda.internetar.com/I’ve made many changes and actually interferes with the structure of the site ranking on Google. More clarity, less ads whenever possible …