Back From Holiday

Does This colour look good ??

fuck that hurt

Cause most of my body is this colour !!

Anyway getting back down to work, Genius Mouse was a site which was banned in Google for hidden links, I should state that the hidden links where a MENU driven by CSS !! grrrr anyway, we decided to redesign it and not pull any strings. We just went VIA Webmastercentral and applied for re-inclusion. I came back from holiday and we have pages indexed, This site was totally removed from Google btw.

so a thumbs up to webmastercentral.

DaveN

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Mixx

14 Comments | Leave a comment »

  1. 1. mick | June 5th 2007 @ 12:55 pm

    “and not pull any strings we just went VIA webmastercentral”

    so you’re saying peeps at google will push things along for you if you ask?

    Naughty naughty ;-)

  2. 2. DaveN | June 5th 2007 @ 1:26 pm

    haha Mick,

    hmmm I can’t confirm or deny that having friends in google could or could not have it’s advantages, But if you are at SMX and have a problem go tell matt cutts or Vanessa “seoboobs” Fox and they will look in to it for you.

    DaveN

  3. 3. KP | June 5th 2007 @ 1:57 pm

    Hey,

    Genius mouse looks pretty cool
    Do search engines treat cases different in URLs?

    http://www.geniusmouse.co.uk/products/Mice.html
    http://www.geniusmouse.co.uk/products/mice.html

    Just wondering if they could get spidered independantly and given different weights. I’ve never tested case sensativity

  4. 4. Viaa | June 5th 2007 @ 3:06 pm

    Thumbs up to webmastercentral? wow…what’s happening Dave ;-)

  5. 5. Rob Haswell | June 5th 2007 @ 3:12 pm

    Hah [seoboobs] returns no results! I’m genuinely surprised that nobody has ever said “seoboobs” online.

  6. 6. Rob Haswell | June 5th 2007 @ 3:21 pm

    @KP:

    URLs are case-sensitive, however that doesn’t necessarily mean search engines treat them in a case-sensitive manner.

    I would think they probably do, but would probably disregard a duplicate content penalty if two URLs differ only in case.

  7. 7. KP | June 5th 2007 @ 4:02 pm

    Cheers Rob,
    thats what I figured, but wondered if anyone had ever tested it.
    I always stick to all lower case so have never had to find out.

  8. 8. Glen | June 5th 2007 @ 6:28 pm

    Ill test it KP

  9. 9. SEOidiot | June 5th 2007 @ 6:52 pm

    welcome back whatisname…. i dont wanna know what part of you that is…

    i dunno about seoboobs i seem to be developing seomoobs :S

  10. 10. DaveN | June 5th 2007 @ 6:57 pm

    seoidiot, it my bit of my side.

    dave

  11. 11. Joost de Valk | June 5th 2007 @ 7:10 pm

    Good to see you back from vacation ;) Funny, my skin usually looks like that before I go on holidays :P

  12. 12. SEOidiot | June 5th 2007 @ 11:07 pm

    thanks for the clarification dave - whats with the formal seoidiot crap - paul is fine

  13. 13. Lea de Groot | June 6th 2007 @ 1:20 am

    Well, generally an apache based system will not return the same page when you have a letter in a different base - you’ll gt a nice 404 - so there are no duplicate content possibilities there (ignoring a really badly coded site)
    I believe MS hosted sites will return the same page for the different case. I haven’t tested the duplicate possibilities myself, but I seem to remember it being mentioned as a problem ocassionaly

  14. 14. Vanessa Fox | June 6th 2007 @ 1:58 am

    I’ve gained a nickname! I’m so lucky.

Leave a Reply

required

required, hidden

+ Advertise Here