Another site: bug/feature. Clicking “repeat the search with…” the number bounds up to 92,500 results. Been seeing this on a bunch of sites lately.
6. Edd | March 1st 2007 @ 11:20 pm
Only one page? I’ve noticed this in lots of sites last two weeks, you browse the index and only get a little % of the pages, but it doesn’t even say that all of the “not shown” are Supplemental, in fact .. plenty of them are valuable and high ranking pages.
Yep, Ryan - that google post outlines the cause of it.
haha Danny…. besides, before he could pull the 301 trick, I blocked all of his priviledges before he left;)
note in my post on the issue - SEW is far from dead since the departure of Danny/Chris… In fact, since Jan1 - we’ve actually seen a bit of improvement in daily traffic. I think i may make a danny-esque post on it:)
Firewall Script I'm going to do a full write up on this, but I have been testing this out on a blog, that's been hacked and DDOS a few times over the last 6 months, why do people feel I want to host their Malware, why don't I just update WP time and effort I guess
Anyway I had been looking for a solution that i can install on a shared box that that I didn't have root access on.
Anyway My test is coming to an end, and I going to try and score a deal on a multiple domain license, or even try and buy a lump of the company lol
11 Comments | Leave a comment »
Wasn’t me :)
I think Elisabeth was going out to get a new Google helmet, and she might have slipped before making the purchase.
I am sure it has nothing to do with the 301 to searchengineland danny put in before he left ;)
“If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.”
Then you get about 93 000 results!
136,000 pages in Supplemental Results
site:searchenginewatch.com *** -view
Another site: bug/feature. Clicking “repeat the search with…” the number bounds up to 92,500 results. Been seeing this on a bunch of sites lately.
Only one page? I’ve noticed this in lots of sites last two weeks, you browse the index and only get a little % of the pages, but it doesn’t even say that all of the “not shown” are Supplemental, in fact .. plenty of them are valuable and high ranking pages.
Google’s fault xD
what’s with all the JS in the top of the file?
Possibly related to this?
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/03/using-site-command.html
Yep, Ryan - that google post outlines the cause of it.
haha Danny…. besides, before he could pull the 301 trick, I blocked all of his priviledges before he left;)
note in my post on the issue - SEW is far from dead since the departure of Danny/Chris… In fact, since Jan1 - we’ve actually seen a bit of improvement in daily traffic. I think i may make a danny-esque post on it:)
Hmm odd
That definitely is strange… I’ve never seen such a difference between the displayed and omitted results.